Sometimes I wonder about the intellegence of the Republican leadership. By caving in to the Democrats on the so-called ‘payroll tax relief extention’ the Republicans have allowed the Dems to frame the debate. This article by Charles Krauthammer details what is at stake, for all of us. I have to include this one little tidbit from Krauthammer:

To begin with, what even minimally rational government enacts payroll tax relief for just two months? As a matter of practicality alone, it makes no sense. The National Payroll Reporting Consortium, representing those who process paychecks, said of the two-month extension passed by the Senate just days before the new year: “There is insufficient lead time to accommodate the proposal,” because “many payroll systems are not likely to be able to make such a substantial programming change before January or even February,” thereby creating “substantial problems, confusion and costs.”
The final compromise appears to tweak this a bit to make it less onerous for small business. But what were they thinking in the first place? What business operates two months at a time? The minimal time horizon for business is the quarter — three months. What genius came up with two? U.S. businesses would have to budget for two-thirds of a one-quarter tax-holiday extension. As if this government has not already heaped enough regulatory impediments and mindless uncertainties upon business.
But making economic sense is not the point. The tax-holiday extension — presumably to be negotiated next year into a 12-month extension — is the perfect campaign ploy: an election-year bribe that has the additional virtue of seizing the tax issue for the Democrats.

Could not have said it better.

Hat Tip: Outside the Beltway

 

I watched the last Fox News Republican Primary tonight in Iowa. Noticeably absent for a majority of the debate were the candidates attacking each other. They had substantive debates, they occasionally agreed with each other and even credited the others for ideas. It was a good debate as the candidates renewed their attacks on their real target—Barack Obama.

This was the last debate in which any second tier candidate wanting to move up to the first tier to make an impression on Iowa caucus voters. None of the in the second tier were able to score any major points. That being said, in any debate, there are winners and losers. The winners were the front runners: Newt and Mitt leading the pack and Perry a distant second. Each made their points and made no major flubs. Each was respectful of the others and was generally on point. The losers were Ron Paul, Michelle Backmann and Gov. Huntsman. They lost because they attacked so much. Ron Paul was just….strange. Senator Santorum was mediocre at best.

So…where does that leave us? Basically right where we started. Barack Obama will face a tough test come next November.

© 2011 The Right State Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha