Does Attorney General Eric Holder actually believe that Republicans do not like him or the President, just because they are both black? These people are really delusional, they are totally off their rockers. I do not like them because they are destroying our country. That is all. I could care less about the color of either one of them. They could be green and I would not care. I do care about my country and what they are doing to her.

Spending is totally out of control with no end in sight. Regulations are coming at a pace unseen since FDR. Holder and Obama are suing the states who are attempting to enforce federal laws on immigration. They are seeing selling weapons to drug dealers and gun runners. The Attorney General is even trying keep states from having fair and free elections. And it is the Democrats who are concerned about race.

Of that group of critics, Mr. Holder said he believed that a few — the “more extreme segment” — were motivated by animus against Mr. Obama and that he served as a stand-in for him. “This is a way to get at the president because of the way I can be identified with him,” he said, “both due to the nature of our relationship and, you know, the fact that we’re both African-American.”

Liberals have always loved playing the race card, it is a knee-jerk reaction to any attack. They know that throwing race into the mix will usually stop debate, because it changes the subject to one which is less palatable to your enemies. The idea of playing the race card is an old trick–accuse your enemies of something so heinous and they will back off.

Unfortunately, the card has been played too much by too many people. Look the politicians who have used race for their benefit: Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Shelia Jackson Lee, Jeremiah Wright, Cynthia_McKinney, Crystal Mangumand (Duke Lacross accuser) many, many more. It is a tired old story, and that dog don’t hunt.

So where do we go from here? Eric Holder will continue to be a distraction for the Obama administration and so he should resign. By accusing his enemies of racism, the Attorney General has diminished both the contributions of legitament black leaders before him, but also those who have actually suffered from real racism. Either way, Attorney General Eric Holder needs to resign. It is wrong for a sitting Attorney General to falsely accuse Republicans of being racists, just because they are questioning him. By playing the race card, Holder is disgracing his office.

Hat Tip: Hot Air

 

Things are not looking good for the Obama administration. In today’s Rasmussen tracking poll, most Americans support the repeal of ObamaCare.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 55% of Likely U.S. Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law passed by Congress in March 2010.

On top of that comes another Rasmussen poll in which only 20% Strongly approve of Obama’s job performance while 39% Strongly disapprove. 33% approve of his handling of the economy. The unemployment rate is still high at 8.6 percent. And a whopping 73.6% think America is on the wrong track.

There is only bad news on the horizon for the President. There are a multitude of problems–unemployment and a stagnant economy on the domestic front with Iran, Iraq, terrorism, China, Russia, and the EU on the foreign front. And yet the President is like Mohamed Ali doing the Rope-a-dope. He will bob and weave avoiding the heavy punches, taking little if no damage himself, and inflicting very little damage to his opponents. And in the end, the President will declare that he is the greatest president ever, and the media and the left will cheer.

The real scary part is that 40% will support Barack Obama, no matter what. Tomorrow, we could find out that the President is not an American citizen, is a closet Muslim, is a socialist, and does not really like America, yet 40% will like him. That is scary. That kind of cavalier attitude by the American people is what brought Hitler to power in Germany.

In the end the American people may well re-elect Barack Obama to another four years. Four more years of endless regulations, tax increases, partisanship, class warfare and a declining America. Four more years of bobbing and weaving with nothing of substance accomplished. When all the chanting of Obama’s name is o’re, and the clamor for a third term dwindles, when the hype starts to fade, and cheering echoes of how great Obama is begins to die away, and when the thrill of electing the first black president ebbs, and the guilt of America’s past is slowly washed away; what are we left with?

Generation upon generation have hoped to leave the next in better shape than we did. Let us hope that we leave our children with a country at all. America will eventually take stock of what they did. Like a drunken sailor’s night has to come to grips with the consequences of his night out on the town, so will we after the thrill is gone. Electing Barack Obama made us feel good about ourselves. We had finally buried the sins of our forefathers, slavery, by electing a black man to the highest office in the land. We had voted for someone totally unqualified to be president to assuage our guilt. Like Nero before us, we cheered while the US burned. But that is not the point, because….at least we feel better, right?

 

Today, the march of freedom took another step as the Supreme Court decided to they needed to take a look at how a three judges in a federal court in San Antonio redrew the Congressional districts. Showing their true colors, the judges made sure the Democrats would win all the new Congressional seats.

On Friday evening, the nation’s highest court granted Texas GOP officials’ request for a stay on a court-drawn map that benefited Democrats. The court’s future decision on the map will affect the boundaries of the Lone Star State’s 36 Congressional districts, a handful of which could be crucial in deciding control of the chamber next year.

Unfortunately, the decision by the High Court will not come until after the deadline for candidates filing for their seats. Even then, the court may do any number of things–send the plan back to the Texas House for redrawing, send the plan back to the three judge panel with instructions, throw the entire thing out, or even approve the San Antonio court’s plan. But most will take a lot of time which throws the Texas march primary into chaos. Candidates are left wondering where to file, when to file, and even what district to file in.

No matter what the outcome is, democracy has won today. Which ever way the Supreme Court rules, the federal court in San Antonio has been given an embarrassing reprimand. Gerrymandering is wrong, even if it is done by a court.

 

Our system of justice in the United States is the best in the world and so it is with that in mind that I write the following post. I am outraged by the verdict of the Incompetent 12. How can 12 people who are presented with such overwhelming evidence of Kaylee Anthony’s guilt in her daughter’s death, return a not guilty verdict on murder, but say she did lie to investigators?

It reminds me of a college basketball I watched this season, in the Road to the Final Four. I do not remember who was playing who, but as a former high school basketball coach I will remember the play. A player was dribbling the basketball to the left side of the goal and attempted a jump shot. As he left the floor, the ball slipped out of his hands. He caught the ball and landed on the floor. The player briefly looked at the referee clearly expecting a traveling call. When none came, he started dribbling the ball once again. It was then that the ref called a double dribble. The problem is this: if the player was guilty of double dribbling the ball, then he was also guilty of traveling with the ball. If he was not guilty of traveling, then he was not guilty of double dribbling either. By missing the original call, the ref set up quite a conundrum.

The same applies to Kaylee Anthony. If she is guilty for lying to investigators, then she should also be guilty of killing her daughter. If she is not guilty of lying to investigators, then she is not guilty of killing her daughter either. For the same reasons as the basketball game, the jurors set up a conundrum. Ms. Anthony can not be guilty of one without the other and vise versa.

Either way, a travesty of justice occurred today. A mother got away with murdering her young daughter for the purpose of partying. Whether the death came by accident or by premeditation is immaterial, the daughter is dead because her mother wanted to party.

While I still think our system of justice is the best in the world, it still has problems: O.J. Simpson got away with murder because of the Incompetent 12 and so did Kaylee Anthony. Her name will go down is history along with O.J.’s as examples of miscarriages of justice.

 

Dude, where’s my country? There was a time when Americans did for themselves. We were called the ‘can do’ nation. Winston Churchill, the former Prime Minister of Great Britain, once said of Americans that the difficult they do with ease, while the impossible may take a little longer. We prided ourselves with our ability to fend for ourselves. We were proud of our nation’s heritage where we overcame great odds, took on the world’s greatest superpower, wrote the world’s most incredible democracy, spread ourselves across this vast county, and built a great nation. We joined together to build the world’s greatest economic engine. We joined together to reach for the stars. And we joined together to take on those ideologies which sought to destroy our democracy: fascism and communism. Together we and our forefathers (and mothers) constructed the most powerful, generous and compassionate country the world has ever known.

What has happened to us? We no longer look to ourselves to solve our problems. We look to the government. Thomas Jefferson, the writer of our Declaration of Independence seems to have foreseen many of our problems today. Either that or he knows the route democracy takes.

Most bad government has grown out of too much government.

I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

Too many trees, call for the government to do something. Too many …., once again, call for the government to do something. Too many…to many…to many… We have so many laws now just to protect us against ourselves, to protect ‘endangered’ wildlife, to….you name it. (In my own business, I need a government permit saying that I am exempt from the need for a permit. How stupid is that?) Because of some people’s call for more government, we no longer really own our land. What happened to us? What happened to our freedoms? What has happened to my country?

Thomas Jefferson had a reason to be fearful of our democracy. Slowly, but surly, we are destroying democracy in our country. One last quote from Jefferson:

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.

Democracy is under assult. The question is, who is going to win. If we stand by and do nothing, we will lose our hold not only with democracy, but our very way of life. Our freedoms hang in the balance.

 

There are two seemingly unrelated stories which if tied together provide an ominous warning to the American people concerning ObamaCare. Right now wenty-six states are challenging Barack Obama’s healthcare plan in court. Acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal K. Katyal has been arguing for the law in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

That argument is at the heart of the constitutional challenge to the healthcare law and its mandate that nearly all Americans have health insurance by 2014.

Katyal argued that healthcare is unique and unlike purchasing other products, like vegetables in a grocery store. “You can walk out of this courtroom and be hit by a bus,” he said. And if such a person has no insurance, a hospital and the taxpayers will have to pay the costs of his emergency care, he said.

Katyal argued that Congress could reasonably decide that since everyone will likely need medical care at some time in their lives, everyone who can afford it should pay part of the cost. And he said the courts should uphold the law under Congress’ broad power to regulate commerce in this country.

Wow! To me that is indeed a stretch. Everyone needs health insurance because of what may happen. Of course if I get run over by a bus, I will probably die. In that case I will not need insurance. Or if I do, the bus company will provide it through their insurance. The fact remains that the law requires everyone to buy health insurance or face a fine or tax or whatever the administration is calling these days.

But what happens if you fail to buy health insurance and you do not pay your fine or tax or …. Then what? For that we can look at this other totally unrelated story. Stockton, California resident Kenneth Wright does not have a criminal record but he woke up at six o’clock in the morning to find 15 police officers outside his house.

As Wright came downstairs in his boxer shorts, he said the officers barged through his front door. Wright said an officer grabbed him by the neck and led him outside on his front lawn.
“He had his knee on my back and I had no idea why they were there,” Wright said.
According to Wright, officers also woke his three young children, ages 3, 7, and 11, and put them in a Stockton police patrol car with him. Officers then searched his house.

“They put me in handcuffs in that hot patrol car for six hours, traumatizing my kids,” Wright said.
As it turned out, the person law enforcement was looking for – Wright’s estranged wife – was not there.

U.S. Department of Education spokesman Justin Hamilton confirmed for News10 Wednesday morning federal agents with the Office of the Inspector General (OIG), not local S.W.A.T., served the search warrant. Hamilton would not say specifically why the raid took place except that it was part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

There was some discussion whether or not the arrest warrant was related to defaulting on student loans. The arresting agency is …a semi-independent branch of the education department that executes warrants for criminal offenses such as student aid fraud, embezzlement of federal aid and bribery, according to Hamilton. The agency serves 30 to 35 search warrants a year.

Taken together these two stories beg the question, will some agency or department possibly within the Commerce Dept. or maybe even Health and Human Services actually employ their own federal agents who will fine and maybe even arrest those who do not buy health insurance? If so, it will set a very dangerous precedent and our individual rights will be in jeopardy.

Fortunately the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals seems to be leaning against ObamaCare being constitutional.

And in an ominous sign for the administration, the judges opened the arguments by saying they knew of no case in American history where the courts had upheld the government’s power to force someone to buy a product.

That argument is at the heart of the constitutional challenge to the healthcare law and its mandate that nearly all Americans have health insurance by 2014.

“I can’t find any case like this,” said Chief Judge Joel Dubina of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. “If we uphold this, are there any limits” on the power of the federal government? he asked.

Indeed, there would be no limits at all to the power of the federal government if ObamaCare is not overturned. In over 220 years Congress has never seen fit to force people to engage in commerce. The very definition of FREEDOM being allowed the opportunity to be responsible for your own actions. Unlimited government power takes away the people’s power to live their lives the way they want.
Hat Tip: Outside the Beltway
Michele Malkin

 

I have never been a big defender of the United Nations. The organization has done nothing to protect nations or individuals. They stand by and let people die right in front of them. The UN has become an organization where petty tyrants while denying rights to their own people have used it as a forum to denounce the United States for any and all perceived injustices. The organization has become a test bed for liberal policies as it supports free abortions on demand and disavows Christianity in all forms. It has become a place where successful countries like the United States is expected to conform to flawed treaties like Kyoto while smaller and developing countries (like China) are allowed a free pass. And now the UN wants to take your guns as well.

A new treaty supported by the UN, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama would call for the US to:

1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.
2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).
3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).
4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.
5. In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.

Called the U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution, the treaty has firm support in the Obama administration who has a rabid anti-gun political history while in the Senate and even as president. He even voted against a law in Illinois which was modeled after the Texas Castle law allowing someone to defend themselves and their ‘castle’ if they have reason to believe someone is attempting to break into their domicile or have reason to believe they are in danger. Interestingly the then Senator Obama voted against this law.

Liberal will say that no one needs to carry a weapon except for the police since it is law enforcements’ job to protect people. This is a complete fallacy. Not only does law enforcement not always defend you, they have no obligation to do so. Under an 1856 Supreme Court ruling and upheld in 1982 and 2005, the courts ruled that “We held that the so-called “substantive” component of the Due Process Clause does not “requir[e] the State to protect the life, liberty, and property of its citizens against invasion by private actors.”

In 1982 the In 1982, the U.S. Court of Appeals said that

“…there is no Constitutional right to be protected by the state against criminals or madmen. The Constitution does not require Federal or State government to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order.”

So, what does all this mean. It means that people can not expect law enforcement to protect them. They must depend on themselves. Without weapons people are incapable of defending themselves either from criminals or from a corrupt government.

Much is made of Adolf Hitler and his war against the Jews. Some historians will say that the German leader actually loosened laws allowing gun ownership. This is just partially correct. Hitler made it easier for everyone to own guns, except Jews.

The Berlin Police President, Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, announced that as a result of a police activity in the last few weeks the entire Jewish population of Berlin had been “disarmed” with the confiscation of 2,569 hand weapons, 1,702 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition. Any Jews still found in possession of weapons without valid licenses are threatened with the severest punishment.

And how did Hitler find out who owned guns? That was easy.

Finding out which Jews had firearms was not too difficult. The liberal Weimar Republic passed a Firearm Law in 1928 requiring extensive police records on gun owners. Hitler signed a further gun control law in early 1938.

And now the UN wants to ban weapons in the United States. Finding out who currently owns guns will not be hard either as guns are registered. If you think Barack Obama will stand up to the United Nations taking of your weapons, guess again. He wants to take our weapons, he wants the American people to be un-armed. Our founding fathers wrote the Second Amendment to the Constitution for a reason: people without weapons can not defend themselves, their property or their country. Hitler knew this and so does our President. Makes you wonder what the Barack Obama has in mind.

Hat Tip: Forbes

 

This is scary.

In a showdown over the privacy rights of gun owners, the Illinois State Police are refusing to release a list identifying all firearm permit holders in the state after Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan determined that the information “must” be made public.

Ordering the Illinois State Police to release the names of those who have gun permits is a slippery slope.  So many violations to civil liberty are taking place: privacy, the 2nd Amendment, …  Bad news and this is just the start.  And this begs the question, if the Illinois State Police are required to turn over this obviously private list, when what else is not private.  Doctor visits, psychiatric visits, or even when you buy an unhealthy burger.  And then having a list of gun owners will give anyone a list who wants them taken away.

 

If there were any doubt of the status of our schools, it can be found within the debates going on in South Carolina as those who want to celebrate the 150th anniversary of Jefferson Davis, the only president of the Confederate States of America. The debate centers on the South’s decision to secede from the United States. On one side are the people who want to celebrate the rich heritage of South Carolina including the most trying period in our nation’s history, the Civil War. Standing again them are those who are protesting the celebration, particularly the NAACP who cite slavery as the reason for the objections. The celebration does not commemorate slavery.

As a former history teacher, having majored in history in college, and having continuously studied history for the last 15 years, I have to say that these people’s knowledge of history is seriously lacking. Slavery was not a true issue in 1860, when South Carolina seceded. In fact the South left the United States over the issues of states rights (which incorporated many things including slavery), and tariffs. The South felt they were the true representatives of our founding fathers and why the US was founded: states rights, limited government, and freedom from devastating tariffs. Slavery did not become an issue for either the North or South until Abraham Lincoln announced his Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.

Only someone who has an axe to grind or are interested in power such provocations and misrepresentations of history would bring them. You only have to look at the NAACP or Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center for examples.

“The ironies are rich,” says Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil rights group, “and particularly ugly. This is a racist event, celebrating a government that stood on a foundation of slavery.” Bernard Simelton of the Alabama NAACP likens the re-enactment to “celebrating the Holocaust.”

The people of South Carolina have a choice, they can either ride the Apology Express as President Obama does for America every time he goes overseas, or they can stand up for what they believe. This festive event is not racist, nor does it celebrate slavery which continues to be a stain on our history. But I would be remiss if I did not mention that EVERY nation has had slavery at one time or another. It is a fact of life and of history.

“We’re celebrating the only president the Confederate States of America ever had,” says Tom Strain, an organizer whose ancestor of the same name was a cavalry soldier in the Confederate Army of Tennessee. “It’s not about slavery. It’s about remembering our history.”

Once again I say, this celebration is not racist. The celebration is not about keeping the Black man down. It is about remembering our history. It is about remembering our history. As Winston Churchill once famously stated (paraphrased), those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it. At a time when the government is infringing more and more into the private lives of everyday Americans, it is so important for people to remember our past. The Confederate States of America was formed as a protest against what they saw as federal excesses. They fought and died protesting against those grievances. Obviously the Civil War still divides Americans.

As in the past, we once again have a choice to make. We can either learn from the past like our ancestors or stand against these intrusions, or we let the government have their will with us. Will we trust them to keep and defend our rights? No, that would be incredibly stupid.

The Tea Party was formed to protest against the encroachment of the federal government upon our individual rights. Taxes are reaching devastating levels, Obamacare is placing a stranglehold on businesses, individual ownership of land is increasingly under duress, and we no longer have federalism as states have less and less power as the national government assumes more.

It is time for Americans to embrace their heritage and fight for their rights. Not with arms but in the ballot box. Not in conflict but with letters and marches and demonstrations. As with the pre-Confederacy South and our founding fathers before them, the American people are under assault. Now is not the time to forget our past. Now is the time to embrace it.

 

Today we celebrate our nation’s independence. This is the day we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence from the British Empire. 234 years ago a proud group of people stood up to the most powerful country in the world and demanded their freedom. They demanded freedom from unfair taxation, freedom to worship the way we choose, freedom of speech, freedom from unwarranted searches and seizures, freedom of purpose and freedom from tyranny. All freedoms were individual in nature, not a collective freedom. Now 234 years later we seem to have forgotten what freedom is all about. Today we seemingly turn to the government for the redress of every grievance. Today we are cattle being led to slaughter by those politicians willing to exploit the ignorance and forgetfulness of Americans. Its time we got back to the foundation of what makes America great, our freedoms.

Our founding fathers fought for freedom, but what is freedom. The answer is rather simple—it is being allowed the opportunity to be responsible for our OWN actions. That is freedom. By living in America all of us have the opportunity to be successful, to control our own destiny, to live our lives as we see fit. Whether or not we choose to take advantage of these opportunities is up to us. We are each free to succeed as well as to fail. Freedom means success or failure is up to us. Each of us is guaranteed the same opportunity, but each of us is not guaranteed success.

At the same time freedom has a price—responsibility. We must be responsible for our actions. Without freedom, we have no responsibility because our decisions are made for us. Because each of us is given the opportunity, we are responsible, our actions become our own. It is because of us that we earn success, not because of government.

The first words of the Constitution of the United States say, “We the people…” It does not say we the government. It does not say me the President. It does not say we the Supreme Court. And it does not say we the Congress. It says ‘We the People.’

Today more and more people are turning to the government for redress of issues once considered an individual matter. More and more people consider a right anything that people need: a job, a house, a car, a phone, a television, healthcare. Most of these things are only worth the wait because of the struggle to attain them. The struggle to buy a house or a larger house is worth the wait because we learn to save, we learned delayed gratification, and we learn to appreciate what we earn. People do not value what is given to them.

Today, we want everything now. We want a big house now; it does not matter that we can not afford it. We say, it is our ‘right’ to have one. Even businesses want in on the deal. At one time a business’s success or failure was determined by the degree of the owner’s skill in managing his business. No more. Now success is determined by the owner’s ability to successfully beg and prostrate himself to a willing politician to prop up his failing company with the taxpayers’ money. The government also controls the banking industry. They control the car companies. They even control what we as property owners can or can not do with our land. Is the land really ours if the government can arbitrarily take it away from us or tell how to use it? The government is also intrusive into other areas of our lives like education, an area once considered the purview of the states. As the government gains more and more power, our freedoms increasingly come under duress. When government is this intrusive, our very liberty is at stake.

The lawmaker is part of the problem. Once upon a time politicians worked for the people, but they now work for their own re-election. They pretend to represent us, their constituents and yet they live in Washington with their cronies. They promise the moon and deliver only shadows. They hold out their hands in friendship and take our money to further their own ends. Their tongues are made of silver and yet we can not believe a word. Congressmen and women go to Congress promising to do our bidding and they serve a different master where the end justifies the means. The Lawmakers have forgotten they work for us.

The other part of the problem is the citizens. We have become lazy. We are told to be diligent, but look out only for ourselves. We are told to listen and choose who would make the best representative for us and yet we believe in pipedreams. We are not informed and usually re-elect the incumbent because of name recognition. We endlessly shower those politicians with praise when they tickle our ears with false hopes. We then dismiss as trouble-makers those who bother to tell us the ugly truth. We expect the government to solve our every problem while we idly sit by and wait for our wealth to accumulate and our possessions to make us the envy of our neighbors. We forgotten how to fend for ourselves.

I am afraid for our country. US Judge Learned Hand once wrote: I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and upon courts. These are false hopes; believe me, these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it…

We are one generation away from tyranny. We can only stop our march into oblivion by renewing our struggle for freedom. What happened to the time of self sufficiency? What happened to the time of struggling for success? What ever happened to the citizen legislator? The government is not the answer to everyday life problems, but we are. Government did not make this country great. We made this country what it is today, the envy of the world. It is time to take back our country and demand the loyalty of our legislators, not the other way around. We need to require our lawmakers to listen to us; for them to understand they do what we want them to do, not for them to do what they think is right for us. We are not children unable to make decisions for ourselves. We need to insist that our government stop its excessive spending. We need to curtail the politicians’ pocketbook addiction and insist on a balanced budget. We need to be adamant about our rights. The government did not give us these rights, these are by birthright, ours. The right to free speech is ours individually. The right to bear arms belongs to each of us. The right to worship as we choose is our birthright. These are our rights and can not be taken away from us.

Each of us needs to be accountable to ourselves, our countrymen, and our children. We as freedom loving citizens have a duty to be informed, to protect and demand our individual rights, and to elect good citizen legislators. Then we need to make Congress accountable to us, the people. Our duties are just as relevant as those of our elected politicians if not more so.

This July 4th, let us renew our pledge to our freedoms and demand our politicians do the same as we remember those who brought these rights to us. And while we are at it, we need to remember those who gave up their lives for the cause of liberty. We still have these rights because of them—our soldiers. We owe it to them, we owe it to our children and our grandchildren to stand up for the freedoms they fought and died for. Freedom is the opportunity to be responsible for our own actions. Freedom is not free, because it requires constant vigilance. Celebrate your freedom by using your rights today.

Happy Birthday, United States!

© 2011 The Right State Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha