Does Attorney General Eric Holder actually believe that Republicans do not like him or the President, just because they are both black? These people are really delusional, they are totally off their rockers. I do not like them because they are destroying our country. That is all. I could care less about the color of either one of them. They could be green and I would not care. I do care about my country and what they are doing to her.

Spending is totally out of control with no end in sight. Regulations are coming at a pace unseen since FDR. Holder and Obama are suing the states who are attempting to enforce federal laws on immigration. They are seeing selling weapons to drug dealers and gun runners. The Attorney General is even trying keep states from having fair and free elections. And it is the Democrats who are concerned about race.

Of that group of critics, Mr. Holder said he believed that a few — the “more extreme segment” — were motivated by animus against Mr. Obama and that he served as a stand-in for him. “This is a way to get at the president because of the way I can be identified with him,” he said, “both due to the nature of our relationship and, you know, the fact that we’re both African-American.”

Liberals have always loved playing the race card, it is a knee-jerk reaction to any attack. They know that throwing race into the mix will usually stop debate, because it changes the subject to one which is less palatable to your enemies. The idea of playing the race card is an old trick–accuse your enemies of something so heinous and they will back off.

Unfortunately, the card has been played too much by too many people. Look the politicians who have used race for their benefit: Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Shelia Jackson Lee, Jeremiah Wright, Cynthia_McKinney, Crystal Mangumand (Duke Lacross accuser) many, many more. It is a tired old story, and that dog don’t hunt.

So where do we go from here? Eric Holder will continue to be a distraction for the Obama administration and so he should resign. By accusing his enemies of racism, the Attorney General has diminished both the contributions of legitament black leaders before him, but also those who have actually suffered from real racism. Either way, Attorney General Eric Holder needs to resign. It is wrong for a sitting Attorney General to falsely accuse Republicans of being racists, just because they are questioning him. By playing the race card, Holder is disgracing his office.

Hat Tip: Hot Air

 

There are many on the left and on the right who have criticized presidential candidate Newt Gingrich for his desire to call activist judges before Congress who make bad decisions. Both sides have rightly denounced the move as dangerous because it eats away at the very fabric of our democracy—an independent judiciary.

Gingrich has suggested that judges who issue what he termed “radical” rulings out of step with mainstream American values should be subpoenaed before Congress to explain themselves before facing possible impeachment. As president, he said, he’d consider dispatching U.S. marshals to round up judges who refuse to show voluntarily. In extreme cases, whole courts could be eliminated.

Ok, they have a point, but how can the left complain when their own side has engaged in one massive power grab? They have been more than willing to give Barack Obama any power he desires. So far, the President has dozens of un-approved advisors he calls Czars. Isn’t this an abrogation of the Constitution? And that is not even discussing Obama Care which gives the Exectutive branch of government huge powers. He has signed 106 Executive Orders on everything from spending to regulations and others infringing on the Legislature. But that is not enough. Now Shelia Jackson Lee is suggesting that Barack Obama take upon himself the power once thought to be the purview of Congress. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/200585-jackson-lee-urges-obama-to-use-executive-power-to-extend-payroll-tax-cut-

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) said Tuesday that President Obama “absolutely” should use his executive power to continue the unemployment benefits and payroll tax cut extension and said she hoped to discuss the option with the White House later in the day.

The amazing thing is that Ms. Lee is a sitting Congresswoman, someone who should know better, someone who should know what power Congress has and which of the powers resides in the Congress alone. She should know full well that only Congress can extend unemployment insurance, that only Congress can extend the payroll tax cut. If she wishes to give up this power, she should resign and let someone else assume the responsibility of representing Houston.

One thing we do not need to do is to give Obama even more power to turn the United States into another failed European democracy. Arbitrarily giving the President power reserved for Congress is stupid since doing so would make the President a virtual dictator.

You’ve got to love the Dems. Every time they attack someone for failure to understand the enter-workings in Washington, they make the same mistake.

 

I watched the last Fox News Republican Primary tonight in Iowa. Noticeably absent for a majority of the debate were the candidates attacking each other. They had substantive debates, they occasionally agreed with each other and even credited the others for ideas. It was a good debate as the candidates renewed their attacks on their real target—Barack Obama.

This was the last debate in which any second tier candidate wanting to move up to the first tier to make an impression on Iowa caucus voters. None of the in the second tier were able to score any major points. That being said, in any debate, there are winners and losers. The winners were the front runners: Newt and Mitt leading the pack and Perry a distant second. Each made their points and made no major flubs. Each was respectful of the others and was generally on point. The losers were Ron Paul, Michelle Backmann and Gov. Huntsman. They lost because they attacked so much. Ron Paul was just….strange. Senator Santorum was mediocre at best.

So…where does that leave us? Basically right where we started. Barack Obama will face a tough test come next November.

 

Is there collusion between the ACLU and the White House? The ACLU has filed a lawsuit against Wisconsin for having the temerity to want to prevent voter fraud. Attourney General Eric Holder is coming to Texas to denounce a state law requiring a state ID in order to vote. What is going on here?

“This lawsuit is the opening act in what will be a long struggle to undo the damage done to the right to vote by strict photo ID laws and other voter suppression measures,” said Jon Sherman, an attorney with the ACLU Voting Rights Project. “Across the nation, legislators are robbing countless American citizens of their fundamental right to vote, and in the process, undermining the very legitimacy of our democracy. We intend to redirect their attention to the Constitution.”

Ohhh. I did not know that having honest and free and fair elections was going against the Constitution. Is it as simple as wanting to protect the voting rights of ordinary citizens, or is there something more sinister than that? Perhaps the reason for the cozy relationship between Democrats and the ACLU is the very fact of requiring state IDs before voting prevents voter fraud. The outrage is directed at the states where the Democrats can no longer steal an election. The Democrats are worried. To be fair, I would be scared to if the only way I could win was by stealing the election. And now the very act of promoting a fair election is taking away their power.

Don’t believe me? Take a look at these two quotes by our Attorney General.

“We are a better nation now than we were because more people are involved in the electoral process,’

“The beauty of this nation, the strength of this nation, is its diversity, and when we try to exclude people from being involved in the process …we weaken the fabric of this country.’’

Interpretation: without voter fraud, we (Democrats) can not win. Without the extra votes, the illegal alien votes, and the illegal votes, the multiple votes, and the intimidation, we can not win. As radio talk show host and author Hugh Hewitt said in his book, “If it’s Not Close, The Can’t Cheat.”

The job of conservatives is to make sure of the integrity of the vote is not compromised, no matter what the outcome. Conservatives will can can wait, the people will come back. Liberals can’t wait, because they can not take the risk. One rule of liberals is that the ‘end justifies the means.’ So if they need to break or bend a few rules and laws and steal a few elections to get their way, oh well. The liberals will not be happy until we are a socialist country. To ensure that takes place, it is paramount that Barack Obama win his re-election bid. Without him, their liberal/socialist agenda slows to a crawl.

So…is collusion really taking place? Absolutely! The ACLU is as left as it gets. And as it turns out, so is Obama. So what if a few elections are compromised, some elections are stolen, and a few politicians unfairly promoted to office. So what? Fair elections is what makes this country different than others. Otherwise…we will be no different than Russia. As our rights are slowly eroded away, we will cheer the return of our hero. Though his election may be tarnished. The important point is that he won. Is that where we have gone after 230 years. Where is Thomas Paine when you need him?

 

Things are not looking good for the Obama administration. In today’s Rasmussen tracking poll, most Americans support the repeal of ObamaCare.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 55% of Likely U.S. Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law passed by Congress in March 2010.

On top of that comes another Rasmussen poll in which only 20% Strongly approve of Obama’s job performance while 39% Strongly disapprove. 33% approve of his handling of the economy. The unemployment rate is still high at 8.6 percent. And a whopping 73.6% think America is on the wrong track.

There is only bad news on the horizon for the President. There are a multitude of problems–unemployment and a stagnant economy on the domestic front with Iran, Iraq, terrorism, China, Russia, and the EU on the foreign front. And yet the President is like Mohamed Ali doing the Rope-a-dope. He will bob and weave avoiding the heavy punches, taking little if no damage himself, and inflicting very little damage to his opponents. And in the end, the President will declare that he is the greatest president ever, and the media and the left will cheer.

The real scary part is that 40% will support Barack Obama, no matter what. Tomorrow, we could find out that the President is not an American citizen, is a closet Muslim, is a socialist, and does not really like America, yet 40% will like him. That is scary. That kind of cavalier attitude by the American people is what brought Hitler to power in Germany.

In the end the American people may well re-elect Barack Obama to another four years. Four more years of endless regulations, tax increases, partisanship, class warfare and a declining America. Four more years of bobbing and weaving with nothing of substance accomplished. When all the chanting of Obama’s name is o’re, and the clamor for a third term dwindles, when the hype starts to fade, and cheering echoes of how great Obama is begins to die away, and when the thrill of electing the first black president ebbs, and the guilt of America’s past is slowly washed away; what are we left with?

Generation upon generation have hoped to leave the next in better shape than we did. Let us hope that we leave our children with a country at all. America will eventually take stock of what they did. Like a drunken sailor’s night has to come to grips with the consequences of his night out on the town, so will we after the thrill is gone. Electing Barack Obama made us feel good about ourselves. We had finally buried the sins of our forefathers, slavery, by electing a black man to the highest office in the land. We had voted for someone totally unqualified to be president to assuage our guilt. Like Nero before us, we cheered while the US burned. But that is not the point, because….at least we feel better, right?

 

It is sad day when the President must distort history to become re-elected.

Now, just as there was in Teddy Roosevelt’s time, there is a certain crowd in Washington who, for the last few decades, have said, let’s respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. “The market will take care of everything,” they tell us. If we just cut more regulations and cut more taxes — especially for the wealthy — our economy will grow stronger. Sure, they say, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, then jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everybody else. And, they argue, even if prosperity doesn’t trickle down, well, that’s the price of liberty.

Now, it’s a simple theory. And we have to admit, it’s one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. That’s in America’s DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. (Laughter.) But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It has never worked. (Applause.) It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the ‘50s and ‘60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade. (Applause.) I mean, understand, it’s not as if we haven’t tried this theory.

To say that our economic problems of the past have come about, especially during the Great Depression, because of a national desire to leave the market alone. Obama says that deregulation and cutting taxes led to our problems now and the Great Depression before that, when the exact opposite thing happened. As I have stated here before, there were worse depressions than the Great Depression, namely the 1920=21 depression. Why was the Great Depression worse? Because a Republican, like Bush and Hoover, chose to intervene and try to help. Then along comes a Democrat who makes things far worse, like Obama and Roosevelt. These are the facts.

Obama has made things worse, a lot worse. The economy works the best when the government stays out of the way. Sure some regulation is needed to keep things on an even keel. But that is not what Obama is doing. Anytime a politician talks about ‘fairness’ and how the rich need to pay their fair share–this is tantamount to communism. Democrats will not want to hear this, but their hero Theodore Roosevelt was as close to a communist the United States has ever had until Barack Obama come along. This is judged entirely from his policies.

Then the President says that lowering taxes and reducing regulation has never worked. Wow, really!? It has worked EVERY time. Did they forget the economic prosperity the US went through after taxes were lowered by Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush. All had great recovery after taxes were lowered to a reasonable level. But when you are willing to do anything to win, then the truth does not matter–winning does.

Now here the President comes along giving us a very distorted version of how we got into the Great Depression. I could be cynical enough to believe that he is doing this deliberately. That is until I talk to some of my more liberal friends. It seems they all suffer from the same disease–they all believe the government got us out of the Great Depression and the government will get us out the the funk we are in now. We may eventually get out, but it will not be because of Barack Obama, it will be because the economy always recovers eventually. The recovery will be anemic, but……at least the Democrats can say they brought us out the this recession if Obama is re-elected. They still take credit for getting us out of the Great Depression, which they did not.

I have one message for the Democrats, learn your history, the real history of the United States.

 

President Obama warned Republicans on Wednesday that he would veto any proposal that attempts to attach “extraneous issues” to an extension of the payroll tax holiday set to expire at the end of the year.

Ever notice how if the Democrats add ‘extraneous issues’ to a bill, whether it is pork, trying to changes laws, or whatever, all is fair. The President even campaigned on the issue of vetoing any bill that contained pork. But when the Republicans do it….. I think the President speaks with a forked tongue.

Hat Tip: CNN

 

Not only does President Obama not know which of the 57 states he is currently located, he is also ignorance enough of the economy to believe that the internet costs Americans jobs.

“Layoffs too often became permanent, not part of the business cycle. And these changes didn’t just affect blue collar workers. If you were a bank teller or a phone operator or a travel agent, you saw many in your profession replaced by ATMs and the internet,” President Obama said at a campaign event in Kansas.

Wow, you really have to wonder about this one. Do you think he has heard of ‘cyber Monday?’ How about the fact the US is a superpower militarily, economically, and informationally. And guess how a good part of that information is disseminated–you guessed, the internet.

I do not know if the Obama just misspoke once again or if he is clueless. I would lean towards the latter.

Hat tip: Powerline

 

Barack Obama gave another speech today blaming former President Bush for our current economic woes. So, what else is new? So old tirade that blames someone else for his massive screw-ups.

So what else did our President say? Not much as first. He wants more government contruction jobs, trade agreements, tax cuts for the struggling, blah, blah, blah.

Obama finally recognizes the elephant in the room, this country’s massive federal debt.

Of course, one of the most important and urgent things we can do for the economy is something that both parties are working on right now –- and that’s reducing our nation’s deficit. Over the last few weeks, the Vice President has been leading negotiations with Democrats and Republicans on this issue, and they’ve made some real progress in narrowing down the differences. As of last week, both parties had identified more than $1 trillion worth of spending cuts already.

But everyone also knows that we’ll need to do more to close the deficit. We can’t get to the $4 trillion in savings that we need by just cutting the 12 percent of the budget that pays for things like medical research and education funding and food inspectors and the weather service. And we can’t just do it by making seniors pay more for Medicare. So we’re going to need to look at the whole budget, as I said several months ago. And we’ve got to eliminate waste wherever we find it and make some tough decisions about worthy priorities.

And that means trimming the defense budget, while still meeting our security needs. It means we’ll have to tackle entitlements, as long as we keep faith with seniors and children with disabilities by maintaining the fundamental security that Medicare and Medicaid provide. And, yes, we’re going to have to tackle spending in the tax code.

There’s been a lot of discussion about revenues and raising taxes in recent weeks, so I want to be clear about what we’re proposing here. I spent the last two years cutting taxes for ordinary Americans, and I want to extend those middle-class tax cuts. The tax cuts I’m proposing we get rid of are tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires; tax breaks for oil companies and hedge fund managers and corporate jet owners.

It would be nice if we could keep every tax break there is, but we’ve got to make some tough choices here if we want to reduce our deficit. And if we choose to keep those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, if we choose to keep a tax break for corporate jet owners, if we choose to keep tax breaks for oil and gas companies that are making hundreds of billions of dollars, then that means we’ve got to cut some kids off from getting a college scholarship. That means we’ve got to stop funding certain grants for medical research. That means that food safety may be compromised. That means that Medicare has to bear a greater part of the burden. Those are the choices we have to make.

So the bottom line is this: Any agreement to reduce our deficit is going to require tough decisions and balanced solutions. And before we ask our seniors to pay more for health care, before we cut our children’s education, before we sacrifice our commitment to the research and innovation that will help create more jobs in the economy, I think it’s only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that has done so well to give up a tax break that no other business enjoys. I don’t think that’s real radical. I think the majority of Americans agree with that.

Emphasis added by TRS

Oh, much gosh. Stop the pandering to the extreme liberal left and lead. Our country is in a deep financial crisis and here he is going down his checklist of what makes evil Republicans. Does the President really think people are stupid enough to believe we have to choose between raising taxes and our seniors, raising taxes and education, and raising taxes and jobs? These are all red herrings. Raising taxes is what kills jobs. One of the arguments for passing the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution was the fact that raising taxes would slow down the economy while lowering taxes would speed up the economy. Using demagoguery to denounce the ones who are creating jobs does not help. It will only endear him to his liberal base.

Once again the President is engaging in class warfare. Once again the President is attacking the very people who are creating jobs. Once again the President is giving us a pseudo-Hobson’s choice. We do not have to choose between raising taxes and keeping medicare. We do not have to choose between raising taxes and funding education. So, the President gives us a false choice knowing some will not see through his charade.

So what if Barack Obama keeps taxes low on the middle income tax bracket. He will do so for only a year! The bottom 50% of wage earners only pay 3% of all taxes paid into the government. Almost half of the country is getting all the benefits of living in a democracy. They have NOTHING at stake, NOTHING to lose and everything to gain. The ancient Greeks gave the power of the vote only to those who owned a sword. The sword owners were also the land owners. This way the keepers of democracy had something to lose, something to protect. Voting to go to war was done by those going to war. Voting on taxes was done by those who had the land. Voting was done by those with something to lose.

Too many people in this country have nothing to lose by arbitrary laws. Too many people gain by taxing other people’s property and income. Too many people are too easily swayed by the rhetoric and demagoguery of a leader captivated on his own seeming infallibility. Bottom line, we are in trouble because of those who are so easily influenced by a smooth talking politician who promises them other people’s money.

 

Did Barack Obama stretch the truth…..again? According to Investors Business Daily, this is what he said just last week.

“We had to hit the ground running and do everything we could to prevent a second Great Depression,” Obama told supporters last week.

And this is what really happened.

The conclusion is that in claiming to have staved off a Depression, the White House and its supporters seem to be engaging in a bit of historical revisionism.

Economists weren’t predicting a Depression.

White House economists forecast in January 2009 that, even without a stimulus, unemployment would top out at just 8.8% — well below the 10.8% peak during the 1981-82 recession, and nowhere near Depression-era unemployment levels.

The same month, the Congressional Budget Office predicted that, absent any stimulus, the recession would end in “the second half of 2009.” The recession officially ended in June 2009, suggesting that the stimulus did not have anything to do with it.

The argument is often made that the recession turned out to be far worse than anyone knew at the time. But various indicators show that the economy had pretty much hit bottom at the end of 2008 — a month before President Obama took office.

Monthly GDP, for example, stopped free-falling in December 2008, long before the stimulus kicked in, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. (See nearby chart.) Monthly job losses bottomed out in early 2009 while the Index of Leading Economic Indicators started to rise in April.

The Stimulus Bill did not have time to take effect. All President Obama did was to slow down the economy recovery by not allowing money and resources to shift to other areas of our fragile economy. This has had the effect of taking the wind out of the recovery sails and causing the weakness to prolong.

For those who do not know, Investors Business Daily is the oracle in the business world. It tells things how it is, regardless of how the outcome may be percieved. By saying Barack Obama is stretching the truth, IBD has called out the Administration on this one. This may come back to haunt him like Al Gore when he said he invented the Internet.

© 2011 The Right State Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha