It is not very often that I write in response to a letter to my local newspaper, the Navasota Examiner, but this is one of those rare exceptions. You can usually tell when someone visits some of these extreme left wing websites for information their information or receive an email asking them to write a letter to the editor with faulty information which the writer buys, hook, line, and sinker. So I wonder why I am constantly surprised by the total lack of unawareness of others. Some people are so gullible. And this is one of those times when I am surprised.
Part of the letter is as follows:
The situation calls to mind a report I recently read: “Fox News Viewers Are The Most Misinformed: Study.” It seems that the University of Maryland conducted the study, in order to determine “how likely consumers of various news outlets and publications were to believe misinformation about a wide range of political issues.” It was discovered that Fox News viewers were significantly more likely to believe NINE political falsehoods, compared to those who listened to newscasters on other networks or read newspapers or news magazines. The items below are four of the nine untruths (verbatim from the report):
(1) Most economists have estimated the health care law will worsen the deficit.
(2) The economy is getting worse.
(3) Most scientists do not agree that climate change is occurring.
(4) It is not clear that Obama was born in the United States.
Any person who reads a poll should do one thing first and foremost, find out who is financing the poll, who is conducting the poll, and if they are reliable. Second, a writer should READ the poll. All by myself in a careful study (five minutes total time, and two clicks of the mouse) I was able to determine the accuracy of the poll.
First, the poll was financed by George Soros, one of the most left wing people I have even heard of. So the poll fails the first test. Second, the people who are conducting the poll is the University of Maryland. No problem there. Though, the questions do tend to be leading the interviewees towards a conclusion they want. Question number 33 reads:
There is a system called “cap and trade” that is meant to reduce the emissions that cause climate change. Just based on what you know, do you favor or oppose the US adopting the cap and trade system?
The question is put out there as if there is no doubt to the accuracy of that statement, which is far from the truth. There are other leading questions as well.
And third, the answers given by the pollsters are misrepresented. For example, 59% of the respondents say that most scientists believe climate change is occurring. This is a direct contradiction to the writer of the letter. Secondly, 55% of respondents say that President Barack Obama was born in the US, a direct contradiction to what was written in the letter. These are all taken from the poll. As far as the economy is concerned, to many people, it is worse.
Then there is the kicker. The respondents are asked about how trustful they are of the news and where did they get their news. But nowhere in the poll were the respondents asked how they rated Fox News for the accuracy of its information. Any conclusion drawn that direction is pure fabrication as you can easily see for yourselves. (Follow the link)
If you were to draw any conclusions, it would be that broadcast news can not be trusted and is biased. Since 50% of respondents say they frequently encountered “information that seemed misleading or false?” and 32%, a majority, received their news from broadcast news, then it follows that it is the major news networks which can not be trusted to deliver true and unbiased information.
The writer concludes by saying:
It would be nice if all Americans and their news outlets aspired to the pursuit of truth, but that ideal doesn’t play on Fox. Places of business which routinely have the Fox News Channel playing should rethink their strategy. And all of us should step back and consider what our responsibilities are, before we speak or print hearsay as fact.
So I would like to respond. It would be nice if people who wrote letters to the editor knew what they were talking about instead of just receiving and accepting their information from sites which can not be trusted. In the future, do your research BEFORE you write. Turns out, Fox News is not the problem after all, its the Main Stream Media like CBS, NBC, and ABC.
I should not be surprised when I see a letter in my local paper which is full of such obvious distortions. And yet I wonder why do people fall for such nonsense? All they have to do is to conduct a little research. That is, unless the distortions were intentional. Maybe I have too much faith in people. When will I learn?