Chuck

 

I watched the last Fox News Republican Primary tonight in Iowa. Noticeably absent for a majority of the debate were the candidates attacking each other. They had substantive debates, they occasionally agreed with each other and even credited the others for ideas. It was a good debate as the candidates renewed their attacks on their real target—Barack Obama.

This was the last debate in which any second tier candidate wanting to move up to the first tier to make an impression on Iowa caucus voters. None of the in the second tier were able to score any major points. That being said, in any debate, there are winners and losers. The winners were the front runners: Newt and Mitt leading the pack and Perry a distant second. Each made their points and made no major flubs. Each was respectful of the others and was generally on point. The losers were Ron Paul, Michelle Backmann and Gov. Huntsman. They lost because they attacked so much. Ron Paul was just….strange. Senator Santorum was mediocre at best.

So…where does that leave us? Basically right where we started. Barack Obama will face a tough test come next November.

 

Is there collusion between the ACLU and the White House? The ACLU has filed a lawsuit against Wisconsin for having the temerity to want to prevent voter fraud. Attourney General Eric Holder is coming to Texas to denounce a state law requiring a state ID in order to vote. What is going on here?

“This lawsuit is the opening act in what will be a long struggle to undo the damage done to the right to vote by strict photo ID laws and other voter suppression measures,” said Jon Sherman, an attorney with the ACLU Voting Rights Project. “Across the nation, legislators are robbing countless American citizens of their fundamental right to vote, and in the process, undermining the very legitimacy of our democracy. We intend to redirect their attention to the Constitution.”

Ohhh. I did not know that having honest and free and fair elections was going against the Constitution. Is it as simple as wanting to protect the voting rights of ordinary citizens, or is there something more sinister than that? Perhaps the reason for the cozy relationship between Democrats and the ACLU is the very fact of requiring state IDs before voting prevents voter fraud. The outrage is directed at the states where the Democrats can no longer steal an election. The Democrats are worried. To be fair, I would be scared to if the only way I could win was by stealing the election. And now the very act of promoting a fair election is taking away their power.

Don’t believe me? Take a look at these two quotes by our Attorney General.

“We are a better nation now than we were because more people are involved in the electoral process,’

“The beauty of this nation, the strength of this nation, is its diversity, and when we try to exclude people from being involved in the process …we weaken the fabric of this country.’’

Interpretation: without voter fraud, we (Democrats) can not win. Without the extra votes, the illegal alien votes, and the illegal votes, the multiple votes, and the intimidation, we can not win. As radio talk show host and author Hugh Hewitt said in his book, “If it’s Not Close, The Can’t Cheat.”

The job of conservatives is to make sure of the integrity of the vote is not compromised, no matter what the outcome. Conservatives will can can wait, the people will come back. Liberals can’t wait, because they can not take the risk. One rule of liberals is that the ‘end justifies the means.’ So if they need to break or bend a few rules and laws and steal a few elections to get their way, oh well. The liberals will not be happy until we are a socialist country. To ensure that takes place, it is paramount that Barack Obama win his re-election bid. Without him, their liberal/socialist agenda slows to a crawl.

So…is collusion really taking place? Absolutely! The ACLU is as left as it gets. And as it turns out, so is Obama. So what if a few elections are compromised, some elections are stolen, and a few politicians unfairly promoted to office. So what? Fair elections is what makes this country different than others. Otherwise…we will be no different than Russia. As our rights are slowly eroded away, we will cheer the return of our hero. Though his election may be tarnished. The important point is that he won. Is that where we have gone after 230 years. Where is Thomas Paine when you need him?

 

Things are not looking good for the Obama administration. In today’s Rasmussen tracking poll, most Americans support the repeal of ObamaCare.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 55% of Likely U.S. Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law passed by Congress in March 2010.

On top of that comes another Rasmussen poll in which only 20% Strongly approve of Obama’s job performance while 39% Strongly disapprove. 33% approve of his handling of the economy. The unemployment rate is still high at 8.6 percent. And a whopping 73.6% think America is on the wrong track.

There is only bad news on the horizon for the President. There are a multitude of problems–unemployment and a stagnant economy on the domestic front with Iran, Iraq, terrorism, China, Russia, and the EU on the foreign front. And yet the President is like Mohamed Ali doing the Rope-a-dope. He will bob and weave avoiding the heavy punches, taking little if no damage himself, and inflicting very little damage to his opponents. And in the end, the President will declare that he is the greatest president ever, and the media and the left will cheer.

The real scary part is that 40% will support Barack Obama, no matter what. Tomorrow, we could find out that the President is not an American citizen, is a closet Muslim, is a socialist, and does not really like America, yet 40% will like him. That is scary. That kind of cavalier attitude by the American people is what brought Hitler to power in Germany.

In the end the American people may well re-elect Barack Obama to another four years. Four more years of endless regulations, tax increases, partisanship, class warfare and a declining America. Four more years of bobbing and weaving with nothing of substance accomplished. When all the chanting of Obama’s name is o’re, and the clamor for a third term dwindles, when the hype starts to fade, and cheering echoes of how great Obama is begins to die away, and when the thrill of electing the first black president ebbs, and the guilt of America’s past is slowly washed away; what are we left with?

Generation upon generation have hoped to leave the next in better shape than we did. Let us hope that we leave our children with a country at all. America will eventually take stock of what they did. Like a drunken sailor’s night has to come to grips with the consequences of his night out on the town, so will we after the thrill is gone. Electing Barack Obama made us feel good about ourselves. We had finally buried the sins of our forefathers, slavery, by electing a black man to the highest office in the land. We had voted for someone totally unqualified to be president to assuage our guilt. Like Nero before us, we cheered while the US burned. But that is not the point, because….at least we feel better, right?

 

Today, the march of freedom took another step as the Supreme Court decided to they needed to take a look at how a three judges in a federal court in San Antonio redrew the Congressional districts. Showing their true colors, the judges made sure the Democrats would win all the new Congressional seats.

On Friday evening, the nation’s highest court granted Texas GOP officials’ request for a stay on a court-drawn map that benefited Democrats. The court’s future decision on the map will affect the boundaries of the Lone Star State’s 36 Congressional districts, a handful of which could be crucial in deciding control of the chamber next year.

Unfortunately, the decision by the High Court will not come until after the deadline for candidates filing for their seats. Even then, the court may do any number of things–send the plan back to the Texas House for redrawing, send the plan back to the three judge panel with instructions, throw the entire thing out, or even approve the San Antonio court’s plan. But most will take a lot of time which throws the Texas march primary into chaos. Candidates are left wondering where to file, when to file, and even what district to file in.

No matter what the outcome is, democracy has won today. Which ever way the Supreme Court rules, the federal court in San Antonio has been given an embarrassing reprimand. Gerrymandering is wrong, even if it is done by a court.

 

It is sad day when the President must distort history to become re-elected.

Now, just as there was in Teddy Roosevelt’s time, there is a certain crowd in Washington who, for the last few decades, have said, let’s respond to this economic challenge with the same old tune. “The market will take care of everything,” they tell us. If we just cut more regulations and cut more taxes — especially for the wealthy — our economy will grow stronger. Sure, they say, there will be winners and losers. But if the winners do really well, then jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everybody else. And, they argue, even if prosperity doesn’t trickle down, well, that’s the price of liberty.

Now, it’s a simple theory. And we have to admit, it’s one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. That’s in America’s DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. (Laughter.) But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It has never worked. (Applause.) It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the ‘50s and ‘60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade. (Applause.) I mean, understand, it’s not as if we haven’t tried this theory.

To say that our economic problems of the past have come about, especially during the Great Depression, because of a national desire to leave the market alone. Obama says that deregulation and cutting taxes led to our problems now and the Great Depression before that, when the exact opposite thing happened. As I have stated here before, there were worse depressions than the Great Depression, namely the 1920=21 depression. Why was the Great Depression worse? Because a Republican, like Bush and Hoover, chose to intervene and try to help. Then along comes a Democrat who makes things far worse, like Obama and Roosevelt. These are the facts.

Obama has made things worse, a lot worse. The economy works the best when the government stays out of the way. Sure some regulation is needed to keep things on an even keel. But that is not what Obama is doing. Anytime a politician talks about ‘fairness’ and how the rich need to pay their fair share–this is tantamount to communism. Democrats will not want to hear this, but their hero Theodore Roosevelt was as close to a communist the United States has ever had until Barack Obama come along. This is judged entirely from his policies.

Then the President says that lowering taxes and reducing regulation has never worked. Wow, really!? It has worked EVERY time. Did they forget the economic prosperity the US went through after taxes were lowered by Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush. All had great recovery after taxes were lowered to a reasonable level. But when you are willing to do anything to win, then the truth does not matter–winning does.

Now here the President comes along giving us a very distorted version of how we got into the Great Depression. I could be cynical enough to believe that he is doing this deliberately. That is until I talk to some of my more liberal friends. It seems they all suffer from the same disease–they all believe the government got us out of the Great Depression and the government will get us out the the funk we are in now. We may eventually get out, but it will not be because of Barack Obama, it will be because the economy always recovers eventually. The recovery will be anemic, but……at least the Democrats can say they brought us out the this recession if Obama is re-elected. They still take credit for getting us out of the Great Depression, which they did not.

I have one message for the Democrats, learn your history, the real history of the United States.

 

President Obama warned Republicans on Wednesday that he would veto any proposal that attempts to attach “extraneous issues” to an extension of the payroll tax holiday set to expire at the end of the year.

Ever notice how if the Democrats add ‘extraneous issues’ to a bill, whether it is pork, trying to changes laws, or whatever, all is fair. The President even campaigned on the issue of vetoing any bill that contained pork. But when the Republicans do it….. I think the President speaks with a forked tongue.

Hat Tip: CNN

 

Not only does President Obama not know which of the 57 states he is currently located, he is also ignorance enough of the economy to believe that the internet costs Americans jobs.

“Layoffs too often became permanent, not part of the business cycle. And these changes didn’t just affect blue collar workers. If you were a bank teller or a phone operator or a travel agent, you saw many in your profession replaced by ATMs and the internet,” President Obama said at a campaign event in Kansas.

Wow, you really have to wonder about this one. Do you think he has heard of ‘cyber Monday?’ How about the fact the US is a superpower militarily, economically, and informationally. And guess how a good part of that information is disseminated–you guessed, the internet.

I do not know if the Obama just misspoke once again or if he is clueless. I would lean towards the latter.

Hat tip: Powerline

 

Jane Fonda is still trying to live down her actions in Vietnam while American POWs were being held and being tortured.

I was to have been on QVC today to introduce my book, “Prime Time,” about aging and the life cycle. The network said they got a lot of calls yesterday criticizing me for my opposition to the Vietnam War and threatening to boycott the show if I was allowed to appear. I am, to say the least, deeply disappointed that QVC caved to this kind of insane pressure by some well funded and organized political extremist groups. And that they did it without talking to me first. I have never shied away from talking about this as I have nothing to hide. I could have pointed out that threats of boycotts are nothing new for me and have never prevented me from having best selling books and exercise DVDs, films, and a Broadway play. Most people don’t buy into the far right lies. Many people have reached out to express how excited they were about my going onto QVC and hearing about my book.

Bottom line, this has gone on far too long, this spreading of lies about me! None of it is true. NONE OF IT! I love my country. I have never done anything to hurt my country or the men and women who have fought and continue to fight for us. I do not understand what the far right stands to gain by continuing with these myths. In this case, they denied a lot of people the chance to hear about a book that can help make life better, easier and more fulfilling. I am deeply grateful for all of the support I have been getting since this happened, including from my Vietnam Veterans friends. (emphasis added by TRS)

Wow!!! Does she really believe that? Lies? She really is delusional. We have pictures of Jane Fonda posing on Vietnamese antiaircraft guns when she toured Vietnam. We have heard her words as she denounced our soldiers while praising the Vietcong. Snopes, a fact finding website, has an excellent article on the actions of Jane Fonda while on tour. While the site does not take sides on the issue, they do insist that she was in Vietnam, that she did embolden our enemies, that she did propagandize, that she did demoralize our troops while in that country. http://www.snopes.com/military/fonda.asp

Jane Fonda aided and abetted, gave comfort to the NVA during the Vietnam War. She has blood on her hands since her actions resulted in the deaths of many American soldiers. Jane Fonda should have been tried and shot for treason instead of being honored.

And now here she is whining because people have long memories. I am one of them. I did not serve in Vietnam, but as a veteran I too have a long memory when it comes to treasonous acts. Because of Jane Fonda, our soldiers were spat upon when they returned to the United States. Because of Jane Fonda, Americans gave up on the war allowing communists to win. Because of Jane Fonda, many more soldiers died.

But thanks to the despicable actions of Jane Fonda, the American people seem to say, Never Again! Never Again will be allow people to trash our troops without retribution. Never Again will we dis our troops. Never Again will our soldiers feel as if the American people abandoned them. Never Again will we forget the sacrifices our our troops. Thanks to the loathsome actions of Jane Fonda, this nation now honors their troops.

 

Our system of justice in the United States is the best in the world and so it is with that in mind that I write the following post. I am outraged by the verdict of the Incompetent 12. How can 12 people who are presented with such overwhelming evidence of Kaylee Anthony’s guilt in her daughter’s death, return a not guilty verdict on murder, but say she did lie to investigators?

It reminds me of a college basketball I watched this season, in the Road to the Final Four. I do not remember who was playing who, but as a former high school basketball coach I will remember the play. A player was dribbling the basketball to the left side of the goal and attempted a jump shot. As he left the floor, the ball slipped out of his hands. He caught the ball and landed on the floor. The player briefly looked at the referee clearly expecting a traveling call. When none came, he started dribbling the ball once again. It was then that the ref called a double dribble. The problem is this: if the player was guilty of double dribbling the ball, then he was also guilty of traveling with the ball. If he was not guilty of traveling, then he was not guilty of double dribbling either. By missing the original call, the ref set up quite a conundrum.

The same applies to Kaylee Anthony. If she is guilty for lying to investigators, then she should also be guilty of killing her daughter. If she is not guilty of lying to investigators, then she is not guilty of killing her daughter either. For the same reasons as the basketball game, the jurors set up a conundrum. Ms. Anthony can not be guilty of one without the other and vise versa.

Either way, a travesty of justice occurred today. A mother got away with murdering her young daughter for the purpose of partying. Whether the death came by accident or by premeditation is immaterial, the daughter is dead because her mother wanted to party.

While I still think our system of justice is the best in the world, it still has problems: O.J. Simpson got away with murder because of the Incompetent 12 and so did Kaylee Anthony. Her name will go down is history along with O.J.’s as examples of miscarriages of justice.

 

Barack Obama gave another speech today blaming former President Bush for our current economic woes. So, what else is new? So old tirade that blames someone else for his massive screw-ups.

So what else did our President say? Not much as first. He wants more government contruction jobs, trade agreements, tax cuts for the struggling, blah, blah, blah.

Obama finally recognizes the elephant in the room, this country’s massive federal debt.

Of course, one of the most important and urgent things we can do for the economy is something that both parties are working on right now –- and that’s reducing our nation’s deficit. Over the last few weeks, the Vice President has been leading negotiations with Democrats and Republicans on this issue, and they’ve made some real progress in narrowing down the differences. As of last week, both parties had identified more than $1 trillion worth of spending cuts already.

But everyone also knows that we’ll need to do more to close the deficit. We can’t get to the $4 trillion in savings that we need by just cutting the 12 percent of the budget that pays for things like medical research and education funding and food inspectors and the weather service. And we can’t just do it by making seniors pay more for Medicare. So we’re going to need to look at the whole budget, as I said several months ago. And we’ve got to eliminate waste wherever we find it and make some tough decisions about worthy priorities.

And that means trimming the defense budget, while still meeting our security needs. It means we’ll have to tackle entitlements, as long as we keep faith with seniors and children with disabilities by maintaining the fundamental security that Medicare and Medicaid provide. And, yes, we’re going to have to tackle spending in the tax code.

There’s been a lot of discussion about revenues and raising taxes in recent weeks, so I want to be clear about what we’re proposing here. I spent the last two years cutting taxes for ordinary Americans, and I want to extend those middle-class tax cuts. The tax cuts I’m proposing we get rid of are tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires; tax breaks for oil companies and hedge fund managers and corporate jet owners.

It would be nice if we could keep every tax break there is, but we’ve got to make some tough choices here if we want to reduce our deficit. And if we choose to keep those tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, if we choose to keep a tax break for corporate jet owners, if we choose to keep tax breaks for oil and gas companies that are making hundreds of billions of dollars, then that means we’ve got to cut some kids off from getting a college scholarship. That means we’ve got to stop funding certain grants for medical research. That means that food safety may be compromised. That means that Medicare has to bear a greater part of the burden. Those are the choices we have to make.

So the bottom line is this: Any agreement to reduce our deficit is going to require tough decisions and balanced solutions. And before we ask our seniors to pay more for health care, before we cut our children’s education, before we sacrifice our commitment to the research and innovation that will help create more jobs in the economy, I think it’s only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that has done so well to give up a tax break that no other business enjoys. I don’t think that’s real radical. I think the majority of Americans agree with that.

Emphasis added by TRS

Oh, much gosh. Stop the pandering to the extreme liberal left and lead. Our country is in a deep financial crisis and here he is going down his checklist of what makes evil Republicans. Does the President really think people are stupid enough to believe we have to choose between raising taxes and our seniors, raising taxes and education, and raising taxes and jobs? These are all red herrings. Raising taxes is what kills jobs. One of the arguments for passing the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution was the fact that raising taxes would slow down the economy while lowering taxes would speed up the economy. Using demagoguery to denounce the ones who are creating jobs does not help. It will only endear him to his liberal base.

Once again the President is engaging in class warfare. Once again the President is attacking the very people who are creating jobs. Once again the President is giving us a pseudo-Hobson’s choice. We do not have to choose between raising taxes and keeping medicare. We do not have to choose between raising taxes and funding education. So, the President gives us a false choice knowing some will not see through his charade.

So what if Barack Obama keeps taxes low on the middle income tax bracket. He will do so for only a year! The bottom 50% of wage earners only pay 3% of all taxes paid into the government. Almost half of the country is getting all the benefits of living in a democracy. They have NOTHING at stake, NOTHING to lose and everything to gain. The ancient Greeks gave the power of the vote only to those who owned a sword. The sword owners were also the land owners. This way the keepers of democracy had something to lose, something to protect. Voting to go to war was done by those going to war. Voting on taxes was done by those who had the land. Voting was done by those with something to lose.

Too many people in this country have nothing to lose by arbitrary laws. Too many people gain by taxing other people’s property and income. Too many people are too easily swayed by the rhetoric and demagoguery of a leader captivated on his own seeming infallibility. Bottom line, we are in trouble because of those who are so easily influenced by a smooth talking politician who promises them other people’s money.

© 2011 The Right State Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha