Entries Tagged as ''

Columbia University Students Have Been Against Free Speech For Generations

According to Ross Kaminsky of Real Clear Politics, the ruckus caused the Columbia University students when Minuteman Project founder Jim Gilchrist came to speak is nothing new.  Turns out a good portion of the student body have been against free speech for…generations.

Around 1960, Ayn Rand was invited to speak at Columbia. My father went to hear her. She was shouted down and, unable to address the crowd, left the podium after properly scolding the students for their bad manners. The protesters spent much of their time railing against the evils of capitalism and liberty.

In about 1985, there were protests and scuffles as students barricaded Hamilton Hall to demand the University divest itself of investments in companies which did business in South Africa. The protesters spent much of their time railing against the evils of capitalism and liberty, with somewhat more physical violence than had been seen 25 years earlier.

And now, 20 years after those protests, I see Columbia students act aggressively, irresponsibly, and disgustingly, trying to silence another invited speaker.

Will you look at that?  Liberal students are against free speech, which is interesting because free speech is what they say they are entitled to when they spout their nonsense.  At least the right will listen and then disagree.  The left says that people are entitled to free speech as long as they agree with you.  What a bunch of crap!

Kaminsky then quotes a letter written to the editor which really takes the cake.

… “Shame on the College Republicans for inviting this fascist thug and provoking such outrage on our campus.” …

Now where have I heard this before?…I know…in the bible.   In Genesis, Adam ate of the fruit given to him by Eve.  When God questioned Adam about why he ate the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, he responded: Genesis 3:12 “The man said, “The woman you put here with me—she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it.””  So it was God’s fault Adam ate the fruit because He is the one who gave him Eve.  This line of protest did not work in Adam’s time and it will not work now.  By the very definition of freedom, we are all responsible for our own actions.  Blaming someone else for what I do is a copout.

Kaminsky nails the issue down between liberals and conservatives in one paragraph.

It is a remarkable thing about liberals (or, at Columbia, outright leftists) in free societies: They are far more intolerant than conservatives. The protesters hate people who oppose illegal immigration. They accept the use of intimidation and violence to keep such people from speaking, then blame the victim for having been controversial. Conservatives generally don’t hate people for their views even if those views are as wrong-headed as those of many (or, in my experience, most) Columbia students.

By-in-large, liberals have forgotten what America is all about.  People came to this country to practice their freedom of speech, their freedom of religion, to avoid political intolerance.  And yet this is exactly where liberals want to take us: back to where there is freedom of speech—as long as it conforms to their standards.  Where the only religion is the worship of self.  Where there is freedom of political expression—as long as it is liberal enough.  This is not the kind of freedoms expressed in the Declaration of Independence or in the Constitution.

Kaminsky wraps up his article with this observation.

Throughout all the years that my family and friends have attended Columbia, it has repeatedly represented itself as a truly illiberal institution, in a way that only the most “liberal” institutions can. The students live in a world which would make Orwell shudder: speech can justify violence, economic conservatives are called “fascists”, and any talk the students disagree with is labeled “hate speech”.

In this way and others, Columbia represents everything that is wrong with the far left in America today, and I am proud to say that while I do give money to a college, it is not to Columbia.

I don’t blame you Ross, I wouldn’t either.  Columbia University students have given themselves a black eye with their conduct during Jim Gilchrist’s speech.  They have also let the world know of the true nature of liberalism and its not a very pretty picture.

Jim Gilchrist in a post he calls The Death of Free Speech, discusses the importance of free speech.

There is a national treasure so dear to the American people that it sometimes requires our life, liberty and sacred honor to protect it. The center piece of our National Treasury of Rights is the freedom of speech, the very cornerstone of self governance that countless heroes have fought and died for to preserve.

Could not have said it better.  Too bad everyone does not understand this one simple fact.  The right to free speech is one of the things that makes America great…as long as you are not at Columbia University.

Charlie Brown Democrats

There are some posts that after reading them, all I can say is—‘Amen!’  We can not trust the Democrats to deal with the security of the United States.

IN SHORT, WITH A WIDE-EYED, the best and the brightest the Democratic Party had to offer went down the road of appeasement with North Korea. Like Charlie Brown always believing Lucy will hold the football, Clinton and Carter raced to the kick-off of peace with a murderous dictator — only to find out that they had (surprise!) been lied to.

The Clinton legacy, already shredding because of his inability to deal with al Qaeda and terrorism, has just been dealt yet another — perhaps mortal — blow by Clinton and Carter’s foolish trust in the North Korean father and son dictators. But more importantly, the problem now is that Democrats are running for House and Senate seats all over the nation supporting some version of this very same appeasement policy towards Iraq, the War on Terror, and critically, Iran.

Jeffery Lord wraps up his post with this comment:

Should America’s national security be turned over to a Congress full of Charlie Browns?

Uhhh…nope!

North Korea Threatens US With a Nuclear-Tipped Missile

I think it is obvious that North Korea’s madman, Kim Jong Il, has lost his marbles.  He announced the successful test of a nuke and I guess he thought the world would applaud his actions.  (Silly dictator, stupid tricks don’t garner applause)  China warned his government not to conduct the nuclear test and now he may have to face the UN without the help of one of their main benefactors.

China, which holds the key to whether tough U.N. sanctions will be imposed, warned North Korea Tuesday that its nuclear test would harm relations and called on the United Nations to take “appropriate measures” to get North Korea to relinquish its nuclear weapons.

Today comes word that North Korea intends on launching a nuclear tipped rocket in a not too veiled threat against the United States if the Bush administration does not concede to their demands.

The North, meanwhile, stepped up its threats aimed at Washington, saying it could fire a nuclear-tipped missile unless the United States acts to resolve its standoff with Pyongyang, the Yonhap news agency reported Tuesday from Beijing.

How long do we put up with threats from these two-bit dictators who threaten the US with nukes?  There is a reason President Bush listed North Korea among the ‘axis of evil’ along with Iraq and Iran.  He is using threats and intimidation to get what he wants.  The Clinton administration caved in to his demands and now Kim Jong Il is acting like a spoiled brat because President Bush is not giving in as well.  In his temper tantrums he is threatening to launch what many believe he does not have—nuclear bombs small enough to fit on a missile.

Even if Pyongyang is confirmed to have nuclear weapons, experts say it’s unlikely the North has a bomb design small and light enough to be mounted atop a missile. Their long-range missile capability also remains in question, after a test rocket in July apparently fizzled out shortly after takeoff.

There have been other problems as well.  The announced successful test of a nuke may not have been as successful as many think.

The explosion set off by North Korea yesterday appears to have been extremely small for a nuclear blast, complicating U.S. intelligence efforts to determine whether the country’s first such test was successful or signaled that Pyongyang’s capabilities are less advanced than expected, several senior U.S. and foreign government officials and analysts said.

A variety of seismic readings around the world yesterday appear to have resulted from no more than a half-kiloton explosion, three officials said — equivalent to 500 tons of TNT and far smaller than the 21- to 23-kiloton plutonium bomb the U.S. military dropped on Nagasaki, Japan, in August 1945.

It may take some days before the US will be able to determine whether it was a real atomic weapon.  The small size of the explosion could have been just 500 tons of TNT thrown into a hole.  It could have been a fizzle instead of a big bang.  Or the test could have been a partial success when a fraction of the plutonium core exploded.

In any case Kim Jong Il is threatening the United States.  Normally we could treat these threats lightly, but in the post 9/11 world, the US must take all threats seriously.  If these threatening maneuvers continue, the US may need to reconsider their response to this rogue regime.

Hat tip: Captain’s Quarters