Entries Tagged as ''

Help Plan the Chet Edwards Retirement Party by Voting for Van Taylor

A group of conservative bloggers have teamed up to support a collection of Republican candidates who would help the Republican Party maintain control of both chambers of Congress.  The group is called Rightroots and is helping raise money and support for a few selected candidates in important closely contested elections.  One of the candidates they support is Van Taylor who is running for the seat currently held by liberal Democrat Chet Edwards.

I am sure other districts have reasons why we need to support their candidate, but Texas needs to be rid of Chet Edwards, a liberal Democrat who continues to be a smudge on the very conservative area of Texas district 17.  TX-17 is home to Texas A&M University (very conservative), Fort Hood, Waco, and the Bryan/College Station area all of which are fairly conservative.  Mr. Edwards talks a great talk, but his walk is so very different from what he says.  This guy need to be retired from Congress and replaced by a good conservative like Van Taylor.

Taylor is a great guy, a Marine, a businessman, a family man, and a true conservative.  Van supports the Second Amendment, tightening the borders, lower taxes, smaller government, is pro-family and anti-abortion, and supports the GWOT.

Chet on the other hand tries to speak out of both sides of his mouth at the same time.  As an example, Chet has been highly critical of Taylor for moving from Dallas to central Texas in order to run in district 17.  Yet Edwards has moved at least three times in order to run for office.

“Edwards himself moved three times for attractive races: to College Station for his first congressional campaign, then to Duncanville [Dallas County] for a Waco-area state senate race and finally to Waco in 1989, when he won the seat he holds to this day” (Waco Tribune June 5, 2006).

Be sure to check out Fact Check Chet for more of our favorite liberal’s walk and speech patterns including how he votes and speaks on abortion, taxes, spending, and lawsuit reform.  This guy is all over the map.  Let’s retire Chet Edwards by supporting Van Taylor!

McKinney in Trouble

Cynthia McKinney is in deep trouble!

GA HOUSE CD 4 - DEM PRIMARY RUNOFF
Hank Johnson 49%
Cynthia McKinney 34%
Undecided 17%

If this holds, I’ll be laughing all the way to November 7th.

Hat tip: Hedgehog Report

Terrorism Defined: Hate Crime

How do you define terrorism? Last week a lone gunman walked into a women’s Jewish center killed one and injured five others. While shooting his victims, he was shouting that he was a Muslim-American and was mad about Israel’s invasion of Lebanon.

Let’s see, Osama bin Laden attacked the US because of US presence in Saudi Arabia. That was terrorism. The US Embassies in Nairobi and Tanzania are bombed in 1998, that was terrorism. In 1995 several US servicemen are killed in a bomb attack on the National Guard center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, that was terrorism. And there are many others, bombs, shootings, stabbings, beheadings, etc. which were all considered terrorism. So why is it when a Muslim man starts shooting unarmed Jewish women, why isn’t that terrorism? It seems that law enforcement is desperate in describing the shooting as a hate crime rather than terrorism.

The man accused in the shooting rampage at Seattle’s Jewish Federation office last week was charged Wednesday with nine felony counts, including aggravated first-degree murder and violation of the state’s hate-crime law.

“Make no mistake, this was a hate crime,” King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng told a news conference. “The attack on these women was an attack on the Jewish community, not only in Seattle but throughout our nation and the world.”

This is like déjà vu all over again. Are we in the middle of the Clinton administration where every act of terrorism is treated as a crime? How are we ever to finish the fight in the Global War on Terror if we can not call these acts what it really are, acts of terror?

Cox and Forkum nail this issue square on the head.

Deaths in Lebanon Staged?

It now looks like Hezbollah has over played their hand.  Everyone knew Hezbollah launches rocket attacks from civilian areas in an attempt to create ‘victims’ when the Israelis respond.  Everyone knows the IDF drops leaflets warning residents to leave ensuring they have enough time to escape.  But when 54 civilians died in an IDF bombing campaign,  world opinion turned against Israel; at least at first.  It turns out there are several inconsistencies with all of the deaths.  First is the fact that the building did not collapse for seven hours after the attack, and then the fact that several of the ‘victims’ did not have the usual look of those who died in a building collapse: concrete dust, blood, etc.  So were all the deaths at Qana staged?   Hmmm.

The IDF is looking into allegations raised over the past few days by several pro-Israel, Jewish and conservative Weblogs that Hizbullah may have staged aspects of the Kana tragedy on Sunday, in which some 60 Lebanese bodies were removed from a building that collapsed seven hours after being hit in an Israel Air Force strike. (snip)

Israel has acknowledged hitting the building, and said 150 Katyushas had been fired from the village in the previous 20 days, with Hizbullah hiding rocket launchers in civilian buildings there. Israel said it did not know civilians were inside the building and expressed sorrow over the tragedy. (snip)

Look at the differences between the two combatants: Hezbollah is intentionally targeting civilians while Israel expresses sorrow of civilian deaths.  It seems as if the terrorists want civilian deaths in Lebanon.  Otherwise why would they deliberately launch their attacks within civilian areas knowing the IDF would respond?  They WANT a high death count.  They are desperate for a reprieve from the fighting in order to regroup, ie, Hezbollah is losing.

All acknowledge the IDF attacked the building that collapsed, but there are inconsistencies aplenty. 

At a press conference on Sunday night, Air Force Chief of Staff Brig.-Gen. Amir Eshel said the building was struck by IAF missiles a little after midnight, but only collapsed seven hours later, at about 7 a.m.

Eshel said he could not explain what caused the structure to collapse so many hours after it was hit, and speculated, while stressing that he had no conclusive evidence, about whether Hizbullah had played a role in what had transpired, perhaps by firing on the building itself.

Another possibility that has been raised is that the building sustained damage from the original strike, but collapsed only later from structural damage or the impact of further IAF strikes nearby. Alternatively, the building may have contained Hizbullah weaponry that detonated after the strike.

MK Benny Elon (National Union) suggested Tuesday that Hizbullah may have played a role in the building’s collapse in an attempt to prevent an international force from entering Lebanon and to place blame on Israel.

“In general, Hizbullah prevents citizens from moving from places that the IDF is attacking. This time it was more,” said Elon. “It wasn’t just prohibiting citizens from leaving this time, it was bringing refugees that aren’t residents of Kafr Kana to areas that they know are going to be attacked. And to be sure it’s attacked, Hizbullah fires from the building next door in order to create the crisis and in order to create the pictures.”

One test to see if this could be true is to ask, ‘is it possible Hezbollah would place civilians in a weakened building and then detonate it for the publicity?’  And the answer is a resounding, ‘YES!’  If staged deaths would help in their struggle against Israel, they would definitely place even more civilians in harms way.

There is another possibility mentioned, that the dead were carried in after the attacks.  Remember that after every other attack in which there were a significant number of civilian deaths, a Hezbollah spokesman would be more than eager to bring in western news crews to photograph the scene.  Not so this time.

According to one of the Web sites raising questions about the affair, Israel Insider, “the accumulating evidence suggests another explanation for what happened at Kana. The scenario would be a setup in which the time between the initial bombing near the building and morning reports of its collapse would have been used to ‘plant’ bodies killed in previous fighting… place them in the basement, and then engineer a ‘controlled demolition’ to fake another Israeli attack.” (snip)

According to the blogs, perhaps the most suspicious element in the Kana affair was the fact that the dead children whose photographs appeared in the media displayed virtually no signs of blood, bruises or broken bones and, with one exception, were not caked with debris or pulverized cement.

For example, according to the antiliberal Conservative Yankee blog, “The child in the photo shows no signs of injuries - no blood, no disfigurement or crushing wounds consistent with a building collapse. The two men [carrying the child] show no signs of having been digging in rubble. Their clothes are unbelievably clean, especially the black fatigues that would so easily shown concrete dust.”

Israel Insider cited a CNN report that, it said, noted the victims had died in their sleep. It seemed highly improbable, the piece asserted, that people could have slept “through thunderous Israeli air attacks. Rescue workers equipped with cameras,” it went on, “were removing the bodies from the same opening in the collapsed structure.

Journalists were not allowed near the collapsed building… Israelis steeled to scenes of carnage from Palestinian suicide bombings and Hizbullah rocket attacks could not help but notice that these victims did not look like our victims. Their faces were ashen gray. While medical examination is clearly called for to arrive at a definitive dating and cause of their deaths, they do not appear to have died hours before. The bodies looked like they had been dead for days.”

Israel pulled out of Lebanon in 1983 because of a similar incident.  Whether these allegations turn out to be true only time will tell, but you can be sure Hezbollah remembers what caused the IDF to withdraw last time.  This can only mean one thing, Hezbollah is not fairing as well as they would like the rest of the world believe and are trying to stage another macabre scene which would lead to the world condemnation of Israel.

At the same time the world is a much smaller place with instant communication around the globe.  Pictures are transmitted to every corner even during times of war.  With this seemingly staged event, bloggers are on the scene examining every detail with their individual abilities.  Just like when the bloggers brought down Dan Rather at CBS News for the obviously faked National Guard memos concerning President Bush, they have now turning their attention to Qana and looking for inconsistencies.  And they have found plenty.  If there is a group of people who know what dead people should look like, particularly those killed in bombing attacks and collapsed buildings; it would be the Israeli people.  When they say the bodies do not look like they were dug out of a collapsed building, I would tend to yield to their expertise.  Of course we all know what the people looked like coming out of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.  The bodies I saw in pictures did not look anything like that.  Hezbollah’s reluctance to allow western photographers in to see the devastation for themselves only reinforces the bloggers perception that they have something to hide.

What does Hezbollah have to hide; a staged event, a desperate attempt at influencing world opinion.  Who know?  But with all these inconsistencies, Hezbollah may have overplayed their hand.  They may find world opinion a fickle thing.

Why Israel Must Finish the Job

For a good look at why Israel must continue its struggle against Hezbollah in spite of the turning of world opinion against them, this article by Jules Crittenden is a must read.

The war in Lebanon must not end short of its logical conclusion. Its logical conclusion is not the successful use of human shields by Hezbollah to hamstring the Israeli Defense Forces. Its logical conclusion is the destruction of Hezbollah as a military and political force that will always remain a threat to peace and stability of the region. (snip)

This shows that Israel, and by extension the free world, is facing an enemy on a spiritual par with the Japanese in the Pacific in World War II, though not nearly as capable as that enemy was, even when that enemy had similarly overplayed its hand. But equally tenacious and delusional, seeing futile acts of suicide and homicide as tactical and strategic coups. (snip)

To end the present suffering of its people, Lebanon cannot be allowed to remain a defacto Shiite-extremist state, dominated by Syria and Iran. An international peacekeeping force cannot be brought in until the root of war is dug out, and Hezbollah is destroyed or effectively removed from Lebanon. That means that for now, as terrible as the toll has been, the use of human shields by Hezbollah cannot be a deterrent to utterly exterminating Hezbollah as a political and military threat and just as significantly, as a symbol of resistance.

This war, like all just wars against aggression, must not end short of its logical conclusion. Its logical conclusion is the extermination of Hezbollah.

It is what I have been saying all along, just not quite this eloquently.  The Israelis must be allowed to protect themselves.  Israel was attacked, has been attacked in the past by this terrorist group, and is fighting for its very survival.  I think Israel must be allowed as long of a leash at they want to finish the job.  By stepping in and stopping the war now, President Bush would not be giving Tel Aviv a lasting peace.

World opinion keeps mentioning the killing of civilians, but it must be remembered that both sides are losing civilians.  Lebanon loses people through the unintentional targeting of houses which house these people.  Israel on the other hand is losing civilians through the use of unguided rockets intended to kill as many civilians as possible.  Lebanese ‘civilians’ will continue to die as long as Hezbollah places them in harms way.

Hat tip: BlackFive