Entries Tagged as ''

The Attack on McCain Explained

You ought to hear a this moonbat in action. A few days ago, on Friday May 19th, John McCain was heckled as he spoke at the commencement ceremony at New School in New York. The liberal school’s students could not be polite and act like adults and listen to a different point of view. Instead, the faculty and graduating seniors acted like spoiled little children who place their fingers in their ears and make weird noises when someone says something they don’t like. I can see it now, “I can’t hear you!”

Now Jean Rohe, the student speaker who ridiculed McCain in front of the student body comes forward with why she did what she did.

“I’m sorry, man,” I told him [McCain], “I just had to do it.” He mumbled something about it being alright, but I think he probably would’ve rather not had me there. It really wasn’t his fault that he got invited into a pit of very well-educated vipers, and it really wasn’t my fault that I did what I had to do in the situation. Had he been speaking at something other than our graduation, or had he spoken about almost anything other than his life and his position on the Iraq War and Darfur it might have been OK. But what did he expect? Campaigning for the Republican presidential nomination at the New School is like trying to catch fish in a swimming pool. It was just totally out of place. Many thanks go to the people in the audience who managed to capture with a few yelled and widely-quoted phrases, just exactly what was going on there.

So the fact that you attacked John McCain was actually his fault because he accepted the invitation to speak at your commencement ceremony. O-kay?!

And then listen to this. And I thought she said she was well educated.

I say we need some “extremist liberals” if we’re ever going to get our democracy back.

Eh? And this.

More importantly, I feel obligated to respond to one thing that McCain told the New York Times. “I feel sorry for people living in a dull world where they can’t listen to the views of others,” he said. This is just preposterous. Yes, McCain was undoubtedly shouted-out and heckled by people who were not politely absorbing his words so as to consider them fully from every angle. But what did he expect? We could’ve all printed out his speech and chanted it with him in chorus. Did he think that no one knew exactly what he was about to say? And it was precisely because we listen to the views of others, and because, as I said in my speech, we don’t fear them, that we as a school were able to mount such a thorough and intelligent opposition to his presence. Ignorant, closed-minded people would not have been able to do what we did. We chose to be in New York for our years of higher education for the very reason that we would be challenged to listen to opposing viewpoints each and every day and to deal with that challenge in a nonviolent manner. We’ve gotten very good at listening to the views of others and learning how to also make our views heard, even when we don’t have the power of national political office and the media on our side.

I think we must remember that as big as this moment may seem to me today and perhaps to other supporters who are reading this article, this is a very small victory in a time when democracy is swiftly eroding under the pressure of the right wing in this country. We all have much work to do, and for the most part the media do not represent us, the small people who don’t hold any special titles but who feel the weight of our government’s actions on our backs each and every day. I never expected to get the opportunity to speak the way I did yesterday, but I’m so glad that I did. I hope that other people found strength in my act of protest and will one day find themselves in my position, drawing out their own bravery to speak truth.

I guess an opposing point of view to them would be someone who wants the US to withdraw from Iraq in forty-six days rather than forty-five. And liberals say conservatives are close-minded. These people are can not tolerate anyone who has a real opposing view. They are like little children who say, “Mine!” and cry when someone says, “That’s Johnny’s toy.”

What is really galling is the way she almost breaks her arm patting herself on the back for acting like a spoiled brat. Yep, you are right. Acting like a spoiled brat is what a real grownups do. If these kids are the future of our country, we are in trouble.

Hat tip: Daily Kos

Update: Power Pundit has a reply to Jean Rohe’s unmerited attack on John McCain.

Evidently, the Senator’s regard for his audience was misplaced. Ms. Rohe and those of her fellow graduates who hailed their school’s President as a war criminal and who greeted the Senator’s reference to a friend’s death with laughter proved only one thing, one sad thing, that they could learn a thing or two about tolerance and respect from the students of Liberty University.

Read the whole thing.

Milblogs Tell Their Story

Fox News has an excellent post on milblogs and include one of my favorites, BlackFive.  In the age of the internet Milblogs most likely would have started anyway, but many started because the MSM are not doing their job.  Our nation is at war and we need inforation.  The MSM are not providing it, so our men and women in uniform are telling their story.  And in the process, the milblogs are providing an invaluable service.

Many milbloggers, including some on active duty, expressed frustration with war coverage by “the mainstream media.”

“The Bush administration and the DoD [Department of Defense] have not been very effective in the information war,” explained Andi C., who, like many “milbloggers,” prefers not to use her full name. “Milblogs have been doing the heavy lifting. Both entities could learn a thing or two from milbloggers.”

Milbloggers are providing an important function in the GWOT in the information they disseminate.  Information the mainstream media are not presenting to the public.

CNN Sheds Tears For Illegal Immigrants

Only CNN would resort to this kind of yellow journalism.  They tell several stories, one of which is this poor sob story how this couple crossed into the US illegally overcoming such tough times so that their children can be American citizens.  You can almost hear the tears splattering on the paper as CNN tells of the horrible consequences of a law being proposed which would not allow children of illegal immigrants born in this country to become US citizens.

At least one lawmaker has proposed ending citizenship by birthright, restricting automatic citizenship at birth to children of U.S. citizens and legal residents.

The United States has one of the most liberal citizenship policies in the world, granting citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil based on an 1868 constitutional amendment.

About 3.1 million children are U.S. citizens by birth, even though one or both of their parents are here illegally, according to estimates by the Pew Hispanic Center.

Many of these female illegal aliens come into this country pregnant.  They don’t go to a doctor or to the hospital until labor starts, believing no one would deport them with American born children in the family, called ‘anchor babies.’

The ‘heart-wrenching’ stories told by CNN come fast and furious.  They are also sickening.  There would not even be any of these stories if these illegal aliens had obeyed the laws of the United States and applied to enter legally.

In case you were still wondering which side the Mexican government was on, take the case of a woman who had a child just twenty miles north of the border, had to have help delivering the baby, and had to be rescued by helicopter.

Alejandro Ramos with the Mexican consulate in Tucson, Arizona, said the mother had asked for a U.S. birth certificate for her daughter, but her whereabouts were unknown.

The Mexican government is always willing to help their own citizens, even after they come to the US.

McGovern Defends Wal-Mart

What has happened to the old lovable moonbat, George McGovern?  He was someone we all liked to make fun of, someone who was always confused about the issues facing America.  Here is a liberal Democrat who….defends Wal-Mart?  Have the liberal
Democrats finally come to their senses?  No, not quite, but McGovern does finally understand companies can only afford to pay their employees so much before they are no longer competitive.

Delphi Corp., the biggest auto parts supplier in the country and the employer of 34,000 hourly workers, is bankrupt. One big reason is that the company’s unionized workers earn $64 an hour in wages and benefits — more than twice what some of its competitors pay.

General Motors and Ford — the companies that have epitomized high-paying unionized jobs over the last several decades — have stated that they will lay off 30,000 workers each. The United Auto Workers, General Motors and Delphi recently announced an agreement to offer voluntary buyouts to the UAW-represented employees at the companies. Wall Street thinks these are just the first steps.

It can be galling to hear companies argue that they have to cut wages and benefits for hourly workers — even as they reward top executives with millions of dollars in stock options. The chief executive of Wal-Mart earns $27 million a year, while the company’s average worker takes home only about $10 an hour. But let’s assume that the chief executive got 27 cents instead of $27 million, and that Wal-Mart distributed the savings to its hourly workers. They would each receive a bonus of less than $20. It’s not executive pay that has created this new world.

I understand the attraction of asking business — the perceived “deep pockets” — to shoulder more of the responsibility for social welfare. But there are plenty of businesses that don’t have deep pockets. And many large corporations operate with razor-thin profit margins as competitors, both foreign and domestic, strive to attract consumers by offering lower prices.

The current frenzy over Wal-Mart is instructive. Its size is unprecedented. Yet for all its billions in profit, it still amounts to less than four cents on the dollar. Raise the cost of employing people, and the company will eliminate jobs. Its business model only works on low prices, which require low labor costs. Whether that is fair or not is a debate for another time. It is instructive, however, that consumers continue to enjoy these low prices and that thousands of applicants continue to apply for those jobs.

Maybe there is hope after all.  No, probably not.  If you read the rest of the op-ed piece, McGovern manages to integrate some of his really liberal ideology into the defense of big business.

Hat tip: Chronicle of the Conspiracy

Albright Castigates Bush on Religion Views

Indris Enoch at Anti Communism calls them Damn athiests.  Peter Kim at PeterSkim.org blog says secularist fascist movement is troubling.  What are they talking about, the one and only Madeleine Albright.

I never had much confidence in former Sec. of State Madeleine Albright when she was a part of President Clinton’s cabinet, but I have even less now that she is a civilian.  In an article by CNN Albright denounces President Bush’s Christian beliefs.

“I worked for two presidents who were men of faith, and they did not make their religious views part of American policy,” she said, referring to Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, both Democrats and Christians.

Before I get started on her views of George Bush, did she just call former Presidents Carter and Clinton Christians?  As a Christian myself, I know I am not supposed to judge, so I will assume the position of fruit inspector instead, inspect the fruit they produce.  Carter, I can almost understand why she would say this, but Clinton?  Bill and Hillary Clinton wore their Christianity like an overcoat, put it on when you need to make points with mostly southern Christians, then take it off the rest of the time.  To President Bush, being a Christian is who he is all the time.  With the other two Presidents, Christianity was more political than anything personal.

With Albright lamenting the fact that George Bush is a real Christian, she shows her lack of understanding of what a real Christian is, and what they believe.  The former Sec. of State complains that Bush’s Christianity is getting in the way of his relations with other countries.  I do not believe I have even one time heard her fuss at the Muslim world for their beliefs.  She does not even complain about the Middle East’s treatment of women.  It is these extreme Muslim beliefs which led to the attacks against America.  But that does not stop her from attacking George Bush on his benign beliefs.  By attacking President Bush for his beliefs and by her silence on other Islamic countries’ beliefs, Albright is condoning the extremist view of Islam.

There is a tremendous difference between the beliefs of President Bush and those of the Muslim world.  Bush can only espouse his views which do not necessarily reflect the views of the rest of the country.  The 1st Amendment of the constitution gives us what we call freedom of religion.  Our leaders can not pick our state religion.  The Muslim world is vastly different.  The state religion and the political leadership are intertwined.  Religion is vigorously enforced.  There is no freedom of religion.  So how can she complain about how George Bush’s religious views are affecting our relationships with other countries? It seems to me that the Islamic world’s extreme views are affecting their relationship with us. The only way Madeleine Albright could possibly question Bush’s religion is if she does not have one idea what Christianity is all about.  Christianity is a personal relationship with God and the belief that Jesus Christ is the son of God.  It is that simple.

So where does Albright’s views come from?

Asked about her own beliefs, Albright said she had “a very confused religious background.”

“I know I believe in God but I have doubts, and doubt is part of faith,” she said.

Huh?  Let me get this straight, Madeleine Albright is confused about her own religious views and so that makes her an expert on all religious views.  It is obvious she does not have even one clue what she is talking about.  She does not understand religion, belief system, personal salvation, or holding a view of religion which would constrain someone’s actions.  In other words, religion for George Bush is personal, something Albright cannot comprehend.

In a side topic Albright says the war in Iraq “may eventually rank among the worst foreign policy disasters in U.S. history.”  How did this woman ever become Secretary of State?  I think it just shows how the Clinton administration would have responded to 9/11.  They would have again launched a few missiles towards Afghanistan calling the US response a tremendous success.  And we would have been even less safe than ever before.  President Bush has al-Queda on the run.  Clinton/Gore’s response would have just further emboldened our enemies.

For the reason of the GWOT, I thank God every day that George Bush is President.

Texas Closing Abortion Clinics, Funding Problems

I always knew that the Houston Chronicle was fairly liberal, but bemoaning the closings of a few abortion clinics is going a little to far in my opinion.

SOME politicians will do almost anything to make a point. Last year, state Sen. Steve Ogden felt such a need to show his pro-life credentials that he jeopardized the health of thousands of Texas women. Now the state is trying to repair the damage.

How can limiting abortions, the number which even Hilary Clinton says is too high, jeopardized the health of women?  Can someone to explain this to me?  Less than 3% of all abortions are performed because the mother’s life is in danger.  With so few abortions needed to save the life of the mother, how is this hazardous?

The Chronicle goes on to explain in code why these clinics need to remain open.

Ironically, these federally subsidized startup clinics offer excellent resources for poor communities. Texas should have more of them. But it is unfair to use these neighborhood health centers in a crusade to weaken Planned Parenthood and other expert providers that can offer birth control, screenings and women’s health care specialists.

Translation: We think even more women should be allowed to kill their unborn children as a form of birth control.  And since we don’t make enough money killing babies, we need federal money to help keep us open.

I say good riddance.

These are some of the reasons women are wanting abortions and the percentages of each.  Very eye opening.

Social Reasons (given as primary reason)

- Feels unready for responsibility    21%

- Feels she can’t afford baby          21%

- Concern for how baby would change her life        16%

- Relationship problem       12%

- Feels she isn’t mature enough       11%

- Has all the children she wants      8%

- Other reasons     4-5%

TOTAL:      93%

“Hard Cases” (given as primary reason)

- Mother’s Health           3%

- Baby may have health problem    3%

       - Rape or Incest 1%

TOTAL:   7%

(Emphasis added by TRS)

Hat tip: Lone Star Times