A whopping 69% of likely voters in Texas want the military on the border with Mexico to prevent illegal immigration. This shows that Texans do not want illegal drugs and crime from illegal immigrants to become the epidemic it is in Arizona. Along with this poll is one which shows Republican Gov. Rick Perry leads uber-liberal Democrat and former sanctuary city promoting mayor Bill White of Houston by 8 points.

Thank goodness Texans get it. We don’t want Texas to go the way of California. White is wrong for Texas.

Can you believe New Mexican Gov. Bill Richardson? When a fellow state like Arizona needs his neighborly help, he abandons her. His actions make me wonder if he does not want his state back in Mexico. He makes me sick. Richardson’s actions are not in keeping with those of a US state.

The border states of the US and Mexico get together every year to discuss issues common to all of them. This year it was Arizona’s turn to host the conference. Using Arizona’s new illegal immigration law as a reason, the Mexican states informed their northern neighbors their intent to boycott the meeting. So Gov. Brewer beat them to the punch and cancelled the meeting.

Gov. Brewer had acted appropriately. The conference was already a sham with the Mexican governors threatening a no show. In the XXVIII Border Governors Conference website, the governor posted the following explaining her actions:

Acting in my capacity as Chair of the XXVIII Border Governors Conference, I am writing you to let you know that your recent confirmation regarding non-attendance at the upcoming conference has led to my decision to cancel the Conference. As you know, all member Governors originally agreed many months ago to have Arizona as the site for the 2010 event. At this time, I find no appropriate alternative to cancellation, since each of you has stated in your correspondence that you will not come due to legislation recently passed in Arizona. Naturally I am disappointed by your decision, as I sincerely believe the gathering of the Governors in Arizona would have presented a great platform to initiate dialogue about the legislation and other topics of great importance to the border region.

Gov. Brewer goes on to say that she wants to meet with the governors of the Mexican states to discuss Arizona’s law and how the law will be implemented along with the myths that have been created.  That is when the New Mexico governor sees his opportunity to not only stab his fellow governor but to gain political points among progressives and Hispanics in his state. So Richardson jumps into the fray. Maybe the yearly Border Conference would not be cancelled after all, especially if he should host the meeting in New Mexico. He should have held firm with Arizona citing the need to stand with a fellow state, but instead, he saw political gain and deserted his fellow citizens next door.

What alternative did Brewer have? The conference was already going to be a bust and so why not take the first step. Mexico has already shown their disdain for our borders and laws by providing maps, water and other assistance to help their citizens who plan to illegally enter the US. The Mexican authorities like the money sent back home by the illegals in the US.

This would have been a good opportunity for Gov. Richardson to stand with his fellow US border state and defend her actions. Arizona is being overrun with illegal aliens and their minions: drugs and crime. A sister state was in trouble and instead of standing with her, Richardson kicks her while she’s down. What a dunce.

Today we celebrate our nation’s independence. This is the day we celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence from the British Empire. 234 years ago a proud group of people stood up to the most powerful country in the world and demanded their freedom. They demanded freedom from unfair taxation, freedom to worship the way we choose, freedom of speech, freedom from unwarranted searches and seizures, freedom of purpose and freedom from tyranny. All freedoms were individual in nature, not a collective freedom. Now 234 years later we seem to have forgotten what freedom is all about. Today we seemingly turn to the government for the redress of every grievance. Today we are cattle being led to slaughter by those politicians willing to exploit the ignorance and forgetfulness of Americans. Its time we got back to the foundation of what makes America great, our freedoms.

Our founding fathers fought for freedom, but what is freedom. The answer is rather simple—it is being allowed the opportunity to be responsible for our OWN actions. That is freedom. By living in America all of us have the opportunity to be successful, to control our own destiny, to live our lives as we see fit. Whether or not we choose to take advantage of these opportunities is up to us. We are each free to succeed as well as to fail. Freedom means success or failure is up to us. Each of us is guaranteed the same opportunity, but each of us is not guaranteed success.

At the same time freedom has a price—responsibility. We must be responsible for our actions. Without freedom, we have no responsibility because our decisions are made for us. Because each of us is given the opportunity, we are responsible, our actions become our own. It is because of us that we earn success, not because of government.

The first words of the Constitution of the United States say, “We the people…” It does not say we the government. It does not say me the President. It does not say we the Supreme Court. And it does not say we the Congress. It says ‘We the People.’

Today more and more people are turning to the government for redress of issues once considered an individual matter. More and more people consider a right anything that people need: a job, a house, a car, a phone, a television, healthcare. Most of these things are only worth the wait because of the struggle to attain them. The struggle to buy a house or a larger house is worth the wait because we learn to save, we learned delayed gratification, and we learn to appreciate what we earn. People do not value what is given to them.

Today, we want everything now. We want a big house now; it does not matter that we can not afford it. We say, it is our ‘right’ to have one. Even businesses want in on the deal. At one time a business’s success or failure was determined by the degree of the owner’s skill in managing his business. No more. Now success is determined by the owner’s ability to successfully beg and prostrate himself to a willing politician to prop up his failing company with the taxpayers’ money. The government also controls the banking industry. They control the car companies. They even control what we as property owners can or can not do with our land. Is the land really ours if the government can arbitrarily take it away from us or tell how to use it? The government is also intrusive into other areas of our lives like education, an area once considered the purview of the states. As the government gains more and more power, our freedoms increasingly come under duress. When government is this intrusive, our very liberty is at stake.

The lawmaker is part of the problem. Once upon a time politicians worked for the people, but they now work for their own re-election. They pretend to represent us, their constituents and yet they live in Washington with their cronies. They promise the moon and deliver only shadows. They hold out their hands in friendship and take our money to further their own ends. Their tongues are made of silver and yet we can not believe a word. Congressmen and women go to Congress promising to do our bidding and they serve a different master where the end justifies the means. The Lawmakers have forgotten they work for us.

The other part of the problem is the citizens. We have become lazy. We are told to be diligent, but look out only for ourselves. We are told to listen and choose who would make the best representative for us and yet we believe in pipedreams. We are not informed and usually re-elect the incumbent because of name recognition. We endlessly shower those politicians with praise when they tickle our ears with false hopes. We then dismiss as trouble-makers those who bother to tell us the ugly truth. We expect the government to solve our every problem while we idly sit by and wait for our wealth to accumulate and our possessions to make us the envy of our neighbors. We forgotten how to fend for ourselves.

I am afraid for our country. US Judge Learned Hand once wrote: I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and upon courts. These are false hopes; believe me, these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it…

We are one generation away from tyranny. We can only stop our march into oblivion by renewing our struggle for freedom. What happened to the time of self sufficiency? What happened to the time of struggling for success? What ever happened to the citizen legislator? The government is not the answer to everyday life problems, but we are. Government did not make this country great. We made this country what it is today, the envy of the world. It is time to take back our country and demand the loyalty of our legislators, not the other way around. We need to require our lawmakers to listen to us; for them to understand they do what we want them to do, not for them to do what they think is right for us. We are not children unable to make decisions for ourselves. We need to insist that our government stop its excessive spending. We need to curtail the politicians’ pocketbook addiction and insist on a balanced budget. We need to be adamant about our rights. The government did not give us these rights, these are by birthright, ours. The right to free speech is ours individually. The right to bear arms belongs to each of us. The right to worship as we choose is our birthright. These are our rights and can not be taken away from us.

Each of us needs to be accountable to ourselves, our countrymen, and our children. We as freedom loving citizens have a duty to be informed, to protect and demand our individual rights, and to elect good citizen legislators. Then we need to make Congress accountable to us, the people. Our duties are just as relevant as those of our elected politicians if not more so.

This July 4th, let us renew our pledge to our freedoms and demand our politicians do the same as we remember those who brought these rights to us. And while we are at it, we need to remember those who gave up their lives for the cause of liberty. We still have these rights because of them—our soldiers. We owe it to them, we owe it to our children and our grandchildren to stand up for the freedoms they fought and died for. Freedom is the opportunity to be responsible for our own actions. Freedom is not free, because it requires constant vigilance. Celebrate your freedom by using your rights today.

Happy Birthday, United States!

Remember when presidential candidate George W. Bush was ridiculed when he did not know where some obscure countries of the world were located. Then in 2008 John McCain was mocked when he misspoke and confused the leaders of Russia and Germany. But those mistakes were no where near as offensive as liberal Democrat Milwaukee County Board Supervisor Peggy West who not only loses the US-Mexico border, but Arizona as well.

“If this was Texas, which is a state that is directly on the border with Mexico, and they were calling for a measure like this, saying that they have a major issue with, you know, undocumented people flooding their borders, I would say, I would have to look twice at this, but this is a state that’s a ways removed from the border…”

Really!? Really!? Can Peggy West be serious? She makes me wonder about the intelligence of Democrats in general. I can even see how someone may not know where some obscure country is located and who their leader is. But not to know which state is a border state and which one is not is pitiful. And to think Democrats had the gall to question the acumen of Bush. Wow!

Senator Jon Kyl’s response to this moron was brilliant.

“You will be interested to learn that Arizona does indeed share a border with Mexico. I have enclosed a map for your convenience.”

This is just too good. If Democrats do this well in November, Republicans will clean house.

Once again we saw a Barak Obama who looked angry, who was more animated than usual, who…looked more presidential(?) than at any time in his presidency. So what happened to bring about this radical change? One of his top generals, and/or his staff, had the audacity to talk to a left leaning newspaper about the Obama administration in a way which was not positive. Not exactly negative, but not positive either. General Stanley McChrystal did not challenge the authority of Barak Obama in any way. He did not violate the trust between them. He was not publicly insubordinate. He did not challenge the civilian control of the military. So what did he do that was so wrong? General McChrystal did kiss Obama’s a** like virtually everyone else does.

So if McChrystal did not violate any trust, then what happened? We all know Obama has very thin skin; he does not tolerate any non-kissing attitudes. There are those on the left say the General should not be unhappy with Obama’s Afghanistan policy, because the two are one and the same. Totally untrue. You can not hamstring the military and then say you are both on the same page. McChrystal has tried to discuss issues with the President, but so far no one has been listening. A challenge of ideas creates an atmosphere of more ideas. As far as Obama is concerned there is only one idea, his. All others are distractions and are therefore dangerous to the mission, is insubordinate, and challenge the civilian leadership of the military.

The war in Afghanistan must be won. Terrorists are out to kill and destroy us. McChrystal is a warrior’s warrior. He leads from the front. There is no doubt he wants win, no matter what. He has his priorities in the right order. He cares little for the politics in Washington which go with job of Commander in Afghanistan. Wining in Afghanistan both militarily and politically does matter. Barak Obama’s firing of McChrystal destabilized our efforts in the Afghanistan theater of war, while the nomination of General Petraeus’ helps to stabilize the area to some degree. But is it enough?

The issue is not General Stanley McChrystal, it’s the President. Obama’s thin skin and lack of toleration dissention is. His anger when announcing McChrystal’s departure proclaimed this loud and clear. Obama’s wounded ego allowed his to fall into this trap. As a result, this war in one fell swoop has become Barak Obama’s war. He now owns this war, win or lose. And he will either carry the burden or the accolades following the war.

What Obama needs to do is to study the Vietnam War. The US became mired in a war of attrition because of the interference of politicians in Washington, not because of decisions made by the boots on the ground. By canning McChrystal, the President is starting off like Johnson who did not try to win the war, but tried not to lose. In the end, he accomplished neither. Barak Obama is on track to attain the same. Obama need to get over his obsession with himself and realize there are more important things at stake—namely winning the war.

What is going on with the Obama administration that their top hand-picked general in Afghanistan, Stanley McChrystal, feels he needs to complain to Rolling Stone magazine to receive attention on the issues relevant to his theater? The General has been maligned and marginalized by this administration from the very beginning. Typical of Obama, foreign policy is just another way for him to apologize to the world for the actions of the United States. And the two wars…they are just another two inconveniences he inherited from George W. Bush. Inconveniences not really worthy of his time.

According to McChrystal, his meeting with Obama in the early days was a “10-minute photo op.” As stated in an earlier post, Obama is totally unqualified to be President as this shows. Everything is about furthering the legacy of Barak Obama, even meeting with his top general who commands the war against the terrorists in Afghanistan.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal is a soldier, pure and simple. He has a war to fight and win. He intends to win either with or without the backing of the White House. But apparently what he can not do is fight the war with the administration actively working against him. The article claims McChrystal has seized control of the war “by never taking his eye off the real enemy: The wimps in the White House.”

General McChrystal is being recalled back to the White House to answer for his comments to Rolling Stone. I would be very surprised if he is left in charge. As a soldier, he answers to his superiors culminating with the President of the United States. Basically, he serves at the whim of Barak Obama and he should have remembered that. But the question still remains, why did McChrystal feel the interview was his last recourse? Are things so bad that the general felt winning the wars was worth his firing? Apparently so.

Barak Obama will not tolerate any challenge to his presidency, even from a high ranking general. What is important is how the President will answer McChrystal. He has a choice, solve the problems with the war in Afghanistan or continue on the path he is—losing the war against terrorism. So far, he is a total failure and America will pay the price for his ineptitude.

Can anyone really say now that Barak Obama is qualified to be President of the most powerful country on earth?  Can we finally admit the guy is in way over his head?  He was most likely a good community organizer.  In that field Obama always had someone to blame for failures.  He could pretend to be doing something.  He could even pretend to be knowledgeable.  He could stand in the middle of a group of admirers and wax poetic.  The only problem is in the real world, people expect results, not empty rhetoric.

Take the economy for example.  Obama continually takes shots at the previous administration of President Bush to take the heat off of his failure to bring prosperity back to the US.  Mr. President, it has been over a year and a half since you took office, it has been your spending, tax policy, and economic blundering with is continuing these economic woes.  It is time to blame yourself for your inadequacies.’  Barak in fact blaming President Bush for all the nations woes while he continues to mirror the failed actions of President Roosevelt during the Great Depression.  (As historians note, Roosevelt policies made the depression worse and last much longer than it should)

Then there is President Obama’s failure in the understanding his job.  While oil spilled in the Gulf, Obama did not talk about the spill or even go to the affected area for nine days.  When criticism starts, he talks the talk and then goes to Louisiana.  His does not go again until he faces even more criticism for his lack of attention on the Gulf.  Funny, he leveled a lot of blame on George Bush for not spending enough time in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.  Hmmm.

After Arizona signs their new immigration law, President Obama dilly-dallied around focusing attention on the law instead of addressing the state’s illegal immigration problem.  He does not even meet with the Governor of Arizona concerning their new illegal immigration law until public opinion forces him to meet with her.  And, of course, nothing substantial comes from the meeting.

Obama does not want to meet with BP chief until public opinion again forces out.  Later on , he plays golf and then has his cronies attack the BP head for attending a Yacht race.  Come on!  Enough is enough.

President Obama has his liberal agenda: Universal medical care, Cap and Trade, helping union coffers and membership; all against the wishes of the American people. He thought he came into the high office with a mandate (a not Bush mandate, maybe).  He thought the job would be easy.  He thought the American people wanted his liberal policies put into action.  But with his out of control spending, his government takeover of the private sector, and his lack of effective control, he will receive a mandate from the American people: not Democrat.  That is the New Mandate.  The people are saying: STOP!  But Obama is not listening.

So far Barak Obama has shown a couple of disturbing trends.  First, the President is reactionary when dealing with critical and timely crises instead of being proactive.  A good leader leads from the front of the pack instead of waiting until public opinion forces his hand.  Second, the President is an out of touch uber-liberal.  As an enlightened liberal, he obviously understands the issues better than the American public and can therefore make better decisions.  As the President he is a caretaker, a parent who takes care of his children.  His high and mighty attitude makes his oblivious to reality.  He is trying to drag the American people with him where they refuse to go.  And lastly, as a good liberal, any predicament is someone else’s fault.  He was misinformed, the American people do not truly understand what is at stake, his issues are THE issues that matter.  Typical know-it-all liberal.  Don’t confuse them with facts, they have their minds made up.

As a result of these three character flaws, Barak Obama is not qualified to be President.  Tim Dunkin aptly invokes the Peter Principle when describing the President’s actions to date.  Obama might have been a very good in community affairs, but he is lousy at being President.  Thus the Barak Obama’s actions so far is like the very definition of the Peter Principle.

© 2010 The Right State Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha